11–20 of 355 posts
We've granted some exceptions to the team responsible for determining how to stand up something internal. Lots of shooting in the dark going on here, so I figured we would need some divulgence of our IP against public tools to gain traction.
We published an internal policy for AI tools last week. The basic theme is: "We see the value too, but please don't copypasta our intellectual property until we get a chance to stand up something internal." We've granted some exceptions to the team responsible for determining how to stand up something internal. Lots of shooting in the dark going on here, so I figured we would need some divulgence of our IP against pu…
Wouldn't it be trivial to add a "read-only" mode to the LLM's operation, where it uses stored knowledge to answer queries but doesn't ingest new knowledge from those queries?
From https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7039943-data-usage-for-c... : > You can request to opt out of having your content used to improve our services at any time by filling out this form ( https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1t2y-arKhcjlKc1I5ohl9Gb16t6S... ). This opt out will apply on a going-forward basis only. It goes to a google form, which is I guess better then them building their own survey platform from scratch…
We block ChatGPT, as do most federal contractors. I think it’s a horrible exploit waiting to happen: - there’s no way they’re manually scrubbing out sensitive data so its bound to spill out from the training data when prompting the model - OpenAI is openly storing all this data they’re collecting to the extent that they’ve had several leaks now where people can see others’ conversations and data. We are one step away…
If we want to be intellectually honest with ourselves, we can either be fearful and have a plan to contain data from ALL of these companies, OR, we address the risk of data leaks through bugs as an equal threat. OpenAI uses Azure behind the scenes, so it'll be as solid (or not solid) as most other cloud-based tools IMO.
As for your data training their data: OpenAI is mostly a Microsoft company now. Most companies use Microsoft for documentation, code, communications, etc. If Microsoft wanted to train on your data, they have all the corporate data in the world. They would (or already could!) train on it.
If there's a fear that OpenAI will train their model on your data submitted through their silly textbox toy, but NOT through training on the troves of private corporate data, then that fear is unwarranted too.
This is where OpenAI should just get a "corporate" tier, charge more for it, and is basically make it HIPAA/SOC2/whatever compliant, and basically do that to assuage the fears of corporate customers.
Any company that doesn't want to feed data into ChatGPT should need to proactively block both ChatGPT and any website serving as a wrapper over it.
We block ChatGPT, as do most federal contractors. I think it’s a horrible exploit waiting to happen: - there’s no way they’re manually scrubbing out sensitive data so its bound to spill out from the training data when prompting the model - OpenAI is openly storing all this data they’re collecting to the extent that they’ve had several leaks now where people can see others’ conversations and data. We are one step away…