Live data from Hacker News

Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

allaboutcircuits.com

111–120 of 132 posts

Re: Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

#111
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The pronunciation of a word depends of a variety of factors, such as the path a loan word followed to get into the language. There is no such thing as "when pronouncing foreign words with th, the sound is invariably converted to a T". Which sound are you referring to, the Greek "Θά" ('θa")? Or the English "th" which becomes the voiced dental fricative /ð/ or the voiceless dental fricative /θ/? Does "ethernet" have a…

>native Spanish So am I. Ever heard of Barrapunto (Spanish Slashdot, RIP), Menéame (Spanish Digg), Naukas (a science boosting group)?

The problem is that, historically, intellectuals in the Spanish-speaking world love excluding average people from participation.

So the most interesting discussions happen in closed circles not in the open.

It is a shitty way of building a society that has its roots in colonial times.

Re: Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

#112
post #2

I'd bet my house over a donut that a Spanish-speaking employee at Nvidia came up with that name. As my friend put it: "hmm, CuLitho de envidia."

For those that don't speak Spanish, this is GPT4's frog dissection: > The joke implies that a Spanish-speaking employee at Nvidia might have come up with the name "CuLitho" because it sounds similar to the Spanish phrase "culo de envidia," which means "butt of envy" or "an envious butt." The phrase is often used to describe someone who is envious or jealous of another person's success or possessions.

[deleted]

Re: Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or, the more realistic explanation, which is that you were in the middle of a heated discussion, said something that wasn’t reasonable or appropriate, got called out on it by multiple people, then backtracked and pretended you were joking the whole time. Which you clearly weren’t. There was no tone shift. There was no /s. There was no “non-serious” tone there. You wanted to call into question their credentials, and f…

Interesting conclusion, but wrong nevertheless. You saw what you wanted to see. Being a native speaker does not give you a final say in a discussion about language, that was the main point being made, with a bit of condiment.

If one person says something, then sure, perhaps they just misread it.

If multiple people respond in the same way (which has happened here) then maybe, just maybe, they're all reacting to the same thing and you are just shit at making your point known.

Re: Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

#114
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>native Spanish So am I. Ever heard of Barrapunto (Spanish Slashdot, RIP), Menéame (Spanish Digg), Naukas (a science boosting group)?

The problem is that, historically, intellectuals in the Spanish-speaking world love excluding average people from participation. So the most interesting discussions happen in closed circles not in the open. It is a shitty way of building a society that has its roots in colonial times.

I' am Spaniard and you are half right. We aren't in Franco times. And, no, most right or left wing journalists and writers are not "interesting discussions". Maybe themselves think they are interesting, but no, not even close. All of them are really mediocre, no matter which side you choose. On proper people from an academic mindset:

- La pizarra de Yuri

- Naukas

- La Aldea Irreductible

These have been since ~y2k or close.

The newer ones came from http://cienciaes.com

Avoid political/philosophical discussions with people from Liberal Arts. They are full of ego's.

Re: Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I call it denial. Given GPT4, I am terrified of what three letter agencies have available today.

Do you think the 3 letter agencies have better AI or just similar LLMs aimed at inteligence purposes ?

Easy guess. Yes, they do. It's their duty to be ahead in the information-gathering field. I trust their brand reputation, more than I do for Nike or Apple. Remember how they rung bells more than 3 months before Ukraine's invasion. Also, I think that there more agencies in the know, not only the 3 letters.

Re: Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting conclusion, but wrong nevertheless. You saw what you wanted to see. Being a native speaker does not give you a final say in a discussion about language, that was the main point being made, with a bit of condiment.

If one person says something, then sure, perhaps they just misread it. If multiple people respond in the same way (which has happened here) then maybe, just maybe , they're all reacting to the same thing and you are just shit at making your point known.

If multiple people think flat earth theory is real, then maybe it is real?

That is the kind of nonsensical mindset that demands defiance.

Also, I don't remember having insulted you.

Re: Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

#117
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you realize that now any human willing to expertiment with them is free to do. All it take is Internet access and an email address. Or a GPU-powered computer to ran them locally. My point is that we can not rightfully estimate who is using it or not. Some LLM models are publicly released after many private trials. Some people had access to GPT4 about 6 to 9 months before the official release. Not accounting primar…

> All that we are certain about is that their rate of improvement follows an exponential growth curve. Are we?

That's based on public info obtained by following OpenAI funders for the last five years. Wish I could provide a link now. It's too much news at this point for me. Better if you verify yourself the above claims.

Re: Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

#118
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you realize that now any human willing to expertiment with them is free to do. All it take is Internet access and an email address. Or a GPU-powered computer to ran them locally. My point is that we can not rightfully estimate who is using it or not. Some LLM models are publicly released after many private trials. Some people had access to GPT4 about 6 to 9 months before the official release. Not accounting primar…

Is this sarcastic?

No sarcasm. Just my personal thoughts.

Re: Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If one person says something, then sure, perhaps they just misread it. If multiple people respond in the same way (which has happened here) then maybe, just maybe , they're all reacting to the same thing and you are just shit at making your point known.

If multiple people think flat earth theory is real, then maybe it is real? That is the kind of nonsensical mindset that demands defiance. Also, I don't remember having insulted you.

[deleted]

Re: Nvidia Unveils CuLitho: A “Breakthrough in Computational Lithography”

#120
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is that, historically, intellectuals in the Spanish-speaking world love excluding average people from participation. So the most interesting discussions happen in closed circles not in the open. It is a shitty way of building a society that has its roots in colonial times.

I' am Spaniard and you are half right. We aren't in Franco times. And, no, most right or left wing journalists and writers are not "interesting discussions". Maybe themselves think they are interesting, but no, not even close. All of them are really mediocre, no matter which side you choose. On proper people from an academic mindset: - La pizarra de Yuri - Naukas - La Aldea Irreductible These have been since ~y2k or…

Also the fact that the Spanish Empire did not see themselves as an empire of intellectuals set on a mission to expand the frontiers of knowledge.

They were about wealth extraction and draining others as fast and unsustainably as possible.

The movements of independence had their origin in Masonic lodges. University founders were either part of the Roman Catholic church, jesuits or masons. All of them known to exclude people for different reasons.

If you were a brilliant woman you would be excluded by masons.

If you were a brilliant person but did not have your sacraments or you were an illegimate child then a Roman Catholic university would likely tell you to go somewhere else. In fact, it is likely that if you died you could not even get a marked grave in a cemetery.

So if you were not wealthy, ethnically european, male or connected to the church or masons then the chances you would be someone in life, and part of the historic record, let alone an intellectual with published works were shit.

And if you somehow surpassed all those barriers and published something then who would buy it? nobody. Because haciendas paid with food, nobody except the Patron would know how to read and the entire continent was all haciendas with indentured servitude until land reforms changed that.

The elites that govern Latin America are not necessarily more altruistic than conquistadors. The difference is closer to Pepsi and Coca-Cola, a bunch of aggrandized cowards that exploit, marginalize people and spend all their day devising new ways to implement structural violence.

Fast forward to 2023, the generation that could make a difference is wasting their time playing Minecraft and Fortnite, or making a stupid TikTok video in their Huawei phones. That is more comforting than getting stabbed in the street.

So yeah, Spanish-speaking Internet is a reflection of that legacy and it is in many cases a sewer of the mind. It is getting better, and there is hope, but we have to say it.

Post reply on HN