The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic societies
1–10 of 425 posts
Re: The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic societies
#2Large scale surveillance while abusive and harmful has historically been limited in scale by the ability of those in control to trawl through data.
Automated "moderation" of dragnet communications collection with modern AI holds the potential for a scale of abusive privacy invasion at unprecedented scales.
Re: The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic societies
#3Re: The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic societies
#4Although I've seen enough HN comments in recent years willing to gamble on giving their kind an inch as if they won't take the whole field given the chance. History's only reliable lesson here is humans having a short memory of trusting these systems to do what they initially promised they would do, for longer than the well-intentioned's term in office.
Re: The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic societies
#5Re: The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic societies
#6https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/poll-72-of-citizens-oppose-...
* 10 countries being: Netherlands, Poland, Germany, Italy, France, Austria, the Czech Republic, Spain, Sweden and Ireland
Re: The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic societies
#7It’s just tiring
Re: The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic societies
#8This is especially important in the age of LLM's. Large scale surveillance while abusive and harmful has historically been limited in scale by the ability of those in control to trawl through data. Automated "moderation" of dragnet communications collection with modern AI holds the potential for a scale of abusive privacy invasion at unprecedented scales.
Re: The chat control proposal does not belong in democratic societies
#9[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Door-in-the-face_technique