Earlier quoted context omitted.
> How about not having a theistic culture? How about not stigmatizing kids who don't fit into the blonde white monoculture that Utah pushes everywhere? The teen mental health crisis is happening everywhere in the US, and in Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. It started about the same time everywhere. Utah's particular culture doesn't have anything to do with it. They're just the state that has reacted first…
There’s no evidence regulation would help, and strong evidence the form of regulation being proposed will make things worse, which the article outlines. Things that could work, that are not known to be harmful: - Parental education campaigns. - Elimination of tracking and other privacy invading technologies for all age groups, not just children. The latter eliminates the need for age blocks, and matches consumer pref…
The only evidence in the article that the law will be harmful is a quote from a free speech lawyer, which doesn't cite any research. If there is strong evidence that the law will be harmful it hasn't been presented yet.
These laws certainly might be harmful! But I think it's much more likely they will have no effect or a positive effect. But we don't know, because restrictions like this haven't been attempted before.
Regardless, it's the state legislature's job to protect public health. I think there's assumed ill intent because it's Utah, but I think the evidence is stronger that this measure will stop so many kids dying by suicide.