11–20 of 31 posts
Is anyone else hit by the Cloudflare "Confirm you are a human" captcha everytime they try to access ChatGPT? It's the only website where it happens to me: and I have to try several times before I get access.
> When you click Delete on a conversation, a PATCH request is made to /backend-api/conversation/05[redacted]2d with the body is_visible: false and gets a response of success: true back. This implies that a conversation is being soft-deleted, not deleted on their systems. Ah yes, lying to the users by showing them a "trash" icon and actually just hiding the conversation from them. What a superb way to build trust from…
Trash is just to drop it from your history, I don't care to keep every conversation, and I also don't care if OpenAI keeps a copy, why should I?
The web app also has built in support for LaTeX rendering (it uses KaTeX). See this forum post: https://community.openai.com/t/new-feature-properly-shown-ma... You can get ChatGPT to output conforming LaTeX expressions using the following prompt: Could you please use the specific LaTeX math mode delimiters for your response? LaTex math mode specific delimiters as following 1. inline math mode : `\(` and `\)` 2. displ…
This doesn't actually cover the most important part, which is where the response to a chat shows up. Has anyone figured this out? I only looked briefly, but AFAICT, it doesn't show up in the response data in Chrome or Firefox DevTools. I figured it was maybe using WebSockets or Server Sent Events, which apparently don't show up in DevTools in some cases (?). I think this is a Chrome bug [0] [1] and also a Firefox bug…
Shows up in Safari as Content-Type: text/event-stream on the https://chat.openai.com/backend-api/conversation endpoint. You can see the network call spin while the text loads. edit: added name of endpoint.
{"detail":"Method Not Allowed"}
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Shows up in Safari as Content-Type: text/event-stream on the https://chat.openai.com/backend-api/conversation endpoint. You can see the network call spin while the text loads. edit: added name of endpoint.
The URL you linked says {"detail":"Method Not Allowed"} When I click on it
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Shows up in Safari as Content-Type: text/event-stream on the https://chat.openai.com/backend-api/conversation endpoint. You can see the network call spin while the text loads. edit: added name of endpoint.
The URL you linked says {"detail":"Method Not Allowed"} When I click on it
This doesn't actually cover the most important part, which is where the response to a chat shows up. Has anyone figured this out? I only looked briefly, but AFAICT, it doesn't show up in the response data in Chrome or Firefox DevTools. I figured it was maybe using WebSockets or Server Sent Events, which apparently don't show up in DevTools in some cases (?). I think this is a Chrome bug [0] [1] and also a Firefox bug…
[0] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55201372/event-stream-da... [1] https://github.com/EventSource/eventsource/issues/94
> When you click Delete on a conversation, a PATCH request is made to /backend-api/conversation/05[redacted]2d with the body is_visible: false and gets a response of success: true back. This implies that a conversation is being soft-deleted, not deleted on their systems. Ah yes, lying to the users by showing them a "trash" icon and actually just hiding the conversation from them. What a superb way to build trust from…
Why would anyone expect that their conversations with ChatGPT are confidential to the point where you could just delete the logs and pretend you never asked? Trash is just to drop it from your history, I don't care to keep every conversation, and I also don't care if OpenAI keeps a copy, why should I?
I say broadly because I don’t necessarily think this particular UI interaction gives the impression of permanent data deletion.
> When you click Delete on a conversation, a PATCH request is made to /backend-api/conversation/05[redacted]2d with the body is_visible: false and gets a response of success: true back. This implies that a conversation is being soft-deleted, not deleted on their systems. Ah yes, lying to the users by showing them a "trash" icon and actually just hiding the conversation from them. What a superb way to build trust from…
Or the same UX in filesystems.
I think trying to make up some kind of moral outrage over this is a stretch.