Puritan americans going to ruin everything if they can.
Anti-porn bills could force device makers to censor sexual material
11–20 of 153 posts
Re: Anti-porn bills could force device makers to censor sexual material
#12> One of these anti-pornography bills was passed into law in 2021 in Utah but cannot go into effect unless five additional states pass similar laws — a provision included to prevent Big Tech companies from isolating the state after passing the law. Ok so they have to isolate five small states instead? I don't think the tech companies will worry until California, New York, or Texas pass this law.
Re: Anti-porn bills could force device makers to censor sexual material
#13> One of these anti-pornography bills was passed into law in 2021 in Utah but cannot go into effect unless five additional states pass similar laws — a provision included to prevent Big Tech companies from isolating the state after passing the law. Ok so they have to isolate five small states instead? I don't think the tech companies will worry until California, New York, or Texas pass this law.
(emphasis added)
Re: Anti-porn bills could force device makers to censor sexual material
#14Re: Anti-porn bills could force device makers to censor sexual material
#15> One of these anti-pornography bills was passed into law in 2021 in Utah but cannot go into effect unless five additional states pass similar laws — a provision included to prevent Big Tech companies from isolating the state after passing the law. Ok so they have to isolate five small states instead? I don't think the tech companies will worry until California, New York, or Texas pass this law.
> This year, Florida, South Carolina, Maryland, Tennessee, Iowa, Idaho, *Texas* and Montana lawmakers are all considering versions of the bill (emphasis added)
Re: Anti-porn bills could force device makers to censor sexual material
#16How would these even work?
Re: Anti-porn bills could force device makers to censor sexual material
#17How would these even work?
Re: Anti-porn bills could force device makers to censor sexual material
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This year, Florida, South Carolina, Maryland, Tennessee, Iowa, Idaho, *Texas* and Montana lawmakers are all considering versions of the bill (emphasis added)
Yes I saw that. I’m saying they won’t worry until Texas actually gets past “considering”
Re: Anti-porn bills could force device makers to censor sexual material
#19It would be amusing to put in a gun recognizer, so unless you enable porn, you can't look at pictures of guns. Just to annoy Idaho.
Re: Anti-porn bills could force device makers to censor sexual material
#20Although this leads down a steep road easily to censor other content also, yet for a long time I have wondered why is it so easy to find porn, and why is nobody doing anything about it ?
Porn is probably one of the major addictive behavioural and thought changing things in this world currently. It takes under 3 seconds to find porn if you want it, probably from any device from anywhere around the world. Is this what humanity wants to optimize for ?
Porn causes distortions in how you think about women, how you sexualize over them and what kind of thoughts you have about women generally. It is very addictive, and leaves you with an empty feeling afterwards.
It can be violent, disturbing, abusive to the people involved and can cause mass scale feelings of not being enough, not being good enough to compared to the people showing you how "sex" should be had.
And yet almost everybody just silently accepts that porn is okay, and nothing should be done about it.
We give 5 year olds smartphones which can lead to the most disturbing porn scenes by just googling a couple of words, within a minute you could be watching somebody just abusing young women violently, and yet this is accepted.
I am all for free speech and that, but I think we have a blind spot here. Probably it is because we are addicted to this as a nation, as a species.
I wish the big players would decide to ban porn, or at least make it substantially harder to find it. It's just a freaking stupid idea that we give our children these devices at very young ages, and almost nobody is doing anything about filtering or limiting what kind of content is available to them in this manner.
Don't you agree ?