Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: More magazines like Quanta and Noema?

news.ycombinator.com

101–102 of 102 posts

Re: Ask HN: More magazines like Quanta and Noema?

#101
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The name libcom is an abbreviation of "libertarian communism" It blows my mind that some people think communism hasn't been tried enough times. "Yes it failed 999 times before, but THIS flavor of communism will definitely work!"

the biggest argument against this is that communist countries still achieve great things in the face of MASSIVE setbacks and sanctions from capitalist countries with lots of power. Yet after an initial period of food insecurity, these nations tend to do great for a while. For example, the CIA reported that the Soviet diet had less calories and was more nutritious than the American diet.

lol Stalin killed 20 million people through direct executions, the Gulag, and famine, but how bout those yummy nutrients?!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excess_mortality_in_the_Soviet...

I'm sure the millions of Ukrainians who were forcibly starved during the Holodomor really appreciated the low calorie diets supplied by the USSR.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

Characterizing the forcible starvation of millions as "a period of food insecurity" is peak techie-communism for me. Thanks for the laugh! :)

Re: Ask HN: More magazines like Quanta and Noema?

#102
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At least it does not fuck up a whole planet when it fails - in contrary to capitalism.

lol right, because China and the Soviet Union are wonderful examples of environmentally friendly economic systems /s > Coal supplied about 55% of China’s total energy consumption in 2021 https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/CHN > It was one of the fastest decimations of an animal population in world history—and it had happened almost entirely in secret. The Soviet Union was a party to the International…

Serving the demand and then imitating the consumism of the capitalists.

I didn't write that 'comunism' is inherently better in the environmental aspect.

At last it is just another ideological idiocy and kakistrocacy.

Post reply on HN