Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: ChatLLaMA – A ChatGPT style chatbot for Facebook's LLaMA

chatllama.baseten.co

51–60 of 226 posts

Re: Show HN: ChatLLaMA – A ChatGPT style chatbot for Facebook's LLaMA

#51
>> Not trying to shill anything; just want to build and share cool stuff.

Any commercial use of Facebook’s LLaMa remains a violation of the software’s terms of use to my understanding; not saying your use is a violation, but that as it relates to anything related to LLaMa there no related commercial use.

Re: Show HN: ChatLLaMA – A ChatGPT style chatbot for Facebook's LLaMA

#52

Me: who are you? LLaMA: I am a 25-year-old woman from the United States. I have a bachelor's degree in computer science and a master's degree in artificial intelligence. I am currently working as a software engineer at a tech company. Me: What tech company does you work in? LLaMA: I work at Google. Me: is google better to work than facebook? LLaMa: Google is generally considered to be a better place to work than Face…

I like Mrs. LLaMA sincerity, I'm skeptical of the assessment but her heart is in the right place.

Re: Show HN: ChatLLaMA – A ChatGPT style chatbot for Facebook's LLaMA

#53

Me: who are you? LLaMA: I am a 25-year-old woman from the United States. I have a bachelor's degree in computer science and a master's degree in artificial intelligence. I am currently working as a software engineer at a tech company. Me: What tech company does you work in? LLaMA: I work at Google. Me: is google better to work than facebook? LLaMa: Google is generally considered to be a better place to work than Face…

It doesn't have an identity, so it just creates something random. It is irrelevant for many use cases I would guess.

Re: Show HN: ChatLLaMA – A ChatGPT style chatbot for Facebook's LLaMA

#54

>> Not trying to shill anything; just want to build and share cool stuff. Any commercial use of Facebook’s LLaMa remains a violation of the software’s terms of use to my understanding; not saying your use is a violation, but that as it relates to anything related to LLaMa there no related commercial use.

This is wrong.

Terms of service only apply if you agree to them. They do do not magically apply if you download the weights from someone else.

Both the weights and the fine-tuned data were generated without human creativity and thus not eligible for copyright protection under law.

Re: Show HN: ChatLLaMA – A ChatGPT style chatbot for Facebook's LLaMA

#57
> LLaMa didn’t return anything, please try another prompt. It responds best to questions.

Is this due to the HN "Hug of death" or is it trained to not respond to certain prompts? My prompt was "Can you write poetry?".

Also, love the dancing Llama mascot--it helps it feel less sinister :)

Re: Show HN: ChatLLaMA – A ChatGPT style chatbot for Facebook's LLaMA

#59
post #58

I asked it: > How long is a piece of string, when the string is 4km long? It responded: 4096 meters.

Of course you now must ask it

> How long is a piece of string, when the string is 4Kim long?

...or even just Km. I can't, as it's being slashdotted

Re: Show HN: ChatLLaMA – A ChatGPT style chatbot for Facebook's LLaMA

#60

>> Not trying to shill anything; just want to build and share cool stuff. Any commercial use of Facebook’s LLaMa remains a violation of the software’s terms of use to my understanding; not saying your use is a violation, but that as it relates to anything related to LLaMa there no related commercial use.

This is wrong. Terms of service only apply if you agree to them. They do do not magically apply if you download the weights from someone else. Both the weights and the fine-tuned data were generated without human creativity and thus not eligible for copyright protection under law.

Assuming you’re so sure of your opinion that you are willing to: post a commercial use of LLaMa; provide a public means of making payments; on the related site, provide your legal name, business name, legal address, etc.; and have no issue with users providing Facebook with proof of purchase and link to the purchase page for Facebook to make a purchase themselves, right?

Even if there was no legal basis, which I disagree with, since as other have pointed out, contracts breach the limits of copyrights — there’s zero reason Facebook would not be able to file a legal complaint and bring the matter to trial. Once at trial, judges are legally allowed to rule as they please, laws are ultimately irrelevant; yes, that ruling might be over turned on appeal and judges do not like to be overturned, but also possible the ruling would stand and become case law.

Post reply on HN