ChatGPT is down
161–170 of 221 posts
Re: ChatGPT is down
#162This is due to rumored hacks/leaks: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgp... We really need an open source alternative instead of putting all our faith in one for-profit company.
I hear two things requested a lot - an open source ChatGPT and more controls on the training/data/usage/etc. How can these two things be held in balance? If it is open source entirely, can't I use the training data and tool in any way I want? What guardrails prevent me from using it to generate hate speech? Given the compute power needed to train/run it; where are people going to do that in any accessible way that do…
> How can these two things be held in balance?
How they can best be balanced kind of depends on the basis for the conclusion that they should be balanced at all, rather than one (or even both) being fundamentally misguided in way which warrants it not guiding policy or practice at all. “There are two things people commonly ask for” does not mean that what we ought to do is some balance between those two things.
Re: ChatGPT is down
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
Microsoft is the best at ensuring your accounts are safe. So safe that I lost my Skype account to some random French hacker in 2014 and still can't get it back even though it was created with my email address. Luckily I've found no reason to pay Microsoft for anything in nearly 2 decades.
How do you use office? The office productivity suite competition only picked up in the last 6-7 years I once did a contract gig with red hat, they asked for a document. I provided an odt file they came back and said they needed a word doc. I saved the doc as a word doc in libreoffice but it completely butchered their template. I was using fedora. That made me realize Microsoft won the office suite wars. It wasn’t unt…
Re: ChatGPT is down
#164Re: ChatGPT is down
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
I look at it much in the same way that OSF is open. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Software_Foundation Trying to legislate what certain words mean and no one can use a particular word as part of their company name unless it checks certain boxes gets into the "you're trying to regulate that ?"
Rules on deceptive advertising and fraud are very much about what words you can use to describe stuff. When a business chooses to use a word because it’s deceptive that’s very questionable IMO.
"GPT-4" and "DALL-E" don't use the word open in their description.
The research is accessible. ( https://openai.com/research )
Why are we trying to legislate and regulate the name of a company?
Re: ChatGPT is down
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
Microsoft is the best at ensuring your accounts are safe. So safe that I lost my Skype account to some random French hacker in 2014 and still can't get it back even though it was created with my email address. Luckily I've found no reason to pay Microsoft for anything in nearly 2 decades.
How do you use office? The office productivity suite competition only picked up in the last 6-7 years I once did a contract gig with red hat, they asked for a document. I provided an odt file they came back and said they needed a word doc. I saved the doc as a word doc in libreoffice but it completely butchered their template. I was using fedora. That made me realize Microsoft won the office suite wars. It wasn’t unt…
Re: ChatGPT is down
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, you forget that the AI that generates hate or other disruption always can be aimed at will, like a weapon. If you thought russian/chinese troll farms were bad, wait for this little trick...
IMO the issue with hate speech is tools like Facebook and twitter that allow it to be broadcast to hundreds of millions of people at once. Slightly increasing the efficiency at at which the hate speech can be written is drops in the ocean compared to that.
Automated cross posting detectors wont work against such messages, meaning human moderators would have to work a lot harder to stop the output of one person.
And there would be more than one person. You could effectively destroy thousands of forums with very few people this way.
Re: ChatGPT is down
#168Re: ChatGPT is down
#169This is due to rumored hacks/leaks: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/11wkw5z/has_chatgp... We really need an open source alternative instead of putting all our faith in one for-profit company.
I wish there was some legally binding definition of "open" in the context of software so that OpenAI could be compelled to change their name.
Re: ChatGPT is down
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand how ChatGPT (or similar interactive agents) function, so I'm very confused by your experience. Was ChatGPT just a replacement for internet searches (e.g. instead of searching for a spec sheet for your model microphone, you asked the bot "what is the for microphone?")? Or was ChatGPT doing the debugging with you just providing data from the real world?
I assume the OP is leaving out the part about something called prompt engineering which has a bit of a learning curve. I'm going to have to dive in to it myself, as it seems like a bit of self-education is required before it can be simply communicated. Some information here : https://github.com/dair-ai/Prompt-Engineering-Guide/blob/mai...
I wondered though if it was especially effective because information on sound hardware is one of those subjects that probably has a huge corpus. Lots of people ask redundant questions about their gear, so accurate information is probably well-correlated in some sense.
In contrast, I wrote three fiction chapters about a group of people on a shared quest of sorts. I tried to get ChatGPT to read those and summarize one of the characters across the three chapters, and it hallucinated like crazy. That's probably something where I need to learn some prompt engineering, or maybe it just isn't supposed to work well.