Live data from Hacker News

Beautiful web type: highlighting the best of the Google web fonts directory

hellohappy.org

1–10 of 45 posts

Re: Beautiful web type: highlighting the best of the Google web fonts directory

#4
Why do fonts look like ants chipped away some pixels in chrome/win7? They look better in Firefox but I remember OSX looking better still, can be wrong about that though since I hadn't access to one in a long time. But fonts in Chrome are plain ugly, someone please turn on AA.

FF on the left, Chrome on the right: http://i.imgur.com/SxlaT.png

Re: Beautiful web type: highlighting the best of the Google web fonts directory

#5
post #4

Why do fonts look like ants chipped away some pixels in chrome/win7? They look better in Firefox but I remember OSX looking better still, can be wrong about that though since I hadn't access to one in a long time. But fonts in Chrome are plain ugly, someone please turn on AA. FF on the left, Chrome on the right: http://i.imgur.com/SxlaT.png

Hm, not sure what happened there. Chrome isn't applying any anti-aliasing to those fonts. No greyscale, no sub-pixel, nothing.

Re: Beautiful web type: highlighting the best of the Google web fonts directory

#6
post #5
post #4

Why do fonts look like ants chipped away some pixels in chrome/win7? They look better in Firefox but I remember OSX looking better still, can be wrong about that though since I hadn't access to one in a long time. But fonts in Chrome are plain ugly, someone please turn on AA. FF on the left, Chrome on the right: http://i.imgur.com/SxlaT.png

Hm, not sure what happened there. Chrome isn't applying any anti-aliasing to those fonts. No greyscale, no sub-pixel, nothing.

Noticed it, too. Pretty disappointing after waiting years to really be able to play with great typography. Especially painful coming from a Google site rendered inside a Google browser.

Re: Beautiful web type: highlighting the best of the Google web fonts directory

#7
1 web page

22 HTTP requests

442.61KB transferred

Thankfully we're not facing an increasing use of mobile devices on high latency networks. Oh.

Platform and browser defaults have come so far that nowadays my preferred font stack is this:

  font-family: sans-serif;

Re: Beautiful web type: highlighting the best of the Google web fonts directory

#8
post #4

Why do fonts look like ants chipped away some pixels in chrome/win7? They look better in Firefox but I remember OSX looking better still, can be wrong about that though since I hadn't access to one in a long time. But fonts in Chrome are plain ugly, someone please turn on AA. FF on the left, Chrome on the right: http://i.imgur.com/SxlaT.png

Chrome on Windows doesn't use the DirectWrite text rendering engine as opposed to Firefox or IE. See details here:

http://eligrey.com/blog/post/better-font-smoothing-in-google...

This has been an open issue since 2009. I'm surprised it still hasn't been fixed even though it's a daily nuisance in the world of beautiful web fonts and large type sizes:

http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=25541

http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=105944

EDIT: an official DirectWrite port of Chrome/Win is currently under development:

https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-dev/...

Re: Beautiful web type: highlighting the best of the Google web fonts directory

#9
post #7

1 web page 22 HTTP requests 442.61KB transferred Thankfully we're not facing an increasing use of mobile devices on high latency networks. Oh. Platform and browser defaults have come so far that nowadays my preferred font stack is this: font-family: sans-serif;

Most sites aren't going to be demoing a bunch of different fonts like this. They'd likely pick one for headers and one for copy.
Post reply on HN