Build full “product skills” and you'll probably be fine
1–10 of 829 posts
Re: Build full “product skills” and you'll probably be fine
#2Re: Build full “product skills” and you'll probably be fine
#3It's common sense, but they say common sense is a superpower.
Wise words for anyone dealing with tech to remember.
Re: Build full “product skills” and you'll probably be fine
#4Probably it is going to degenerate (pun intended) after feeding on stuff that it generated itself.
What do you think?
Re: Build full “product skills” and you'll probably be fine
#5Re: Build full “product skills” and you'll probably be fine
#6If programmers can be replaced by AI, so can every other white collar job and humanity will look very different than what it is now. And I’ve been using ChatGPT and copilot and it’s a nice tool but nowhere near a replacement for knowing how to program.
Re: Build full “product skills” and you'll probably be fine
#7I would just remind everyone that this so-called intelligence is generative text editor and feeds on our creativity/content. Probably it is going to degenerate (pun intended) after feeding on stuff that it generated itself. What do you think?
Re: Build full “product skills” and you'll probably be fine
#8Re: Build full “product skills” and you'll probably be fine
#9If programmers can be replaced by AI, so can every other white collar job and humanity will look very different than what it is now. And I’ve been using ChatGPT and copilot and it’s a nice tool but nowhere near a replacement for knowing how to program.
I'm sorry, but the landscape in then might be as alien to someone asking today, as todays would have been to someone asking 15 years ago (2008).
What John said is correct, but personally I think he's underplaying how much people could be affected. Those "product skills" take years of grinding to really sharpen, and in 15 years only a few people might actually be needed to apply them
Re: Build full “product skills” and you'll probably be fine
#10Such “automation is not a problem, because…” opinions have something in common: they’re looking at a subset of the affected population which has some trait making the transition easier.
Personally I’ve tried my hand at roles like architect, product owner, scrum master, etc and I was involved in most aspects of a software product’s lifecycle. These other roles are very different to coding and for someone that enjoys the simplicity of taming a machine, even exhausting.
I have my doubts that there will be enough “AI guide” jobs for all programmers, but the specific person Carmack’s talking to may indeed be fine.