UK backs Rolls-Royce project to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
1–10 of 185 posts
Re: UK backs Rolls-Royce project to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
#2A nuclear reactor on the moon?
I don't get it.
Meta spent north of $30 Billions to build a "metaverse" that I would not even consider to be alpha-level quality, and some people at Rolls-Royce think they can build a nuclear reactor for how much?
Re: UK backs Rolls-Royce project to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
#3Re: UK backs Rolls-Royce project to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
#4Re: UK backs Rolls-Royce project to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
#5"The UKSA will now provide £2.9 million (around $3.52 million) of funding for the project." A nuclear reactor on the moon? I don't get it. Meta spent north of $30 Billions to build a "metaverse" that I would not even consider to be alpha-level quality, and some people at Rolls-Royce think they can build a nuclear reactor for how much?
Re: UK backs Rolls-Royce project to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
#6Re: UK backs Rolls-Royce project to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
#7Re: UK backs Rolls-Royce project to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
#8"The UKSA will now provide £2.9 million (around $3.52 million) of funding for the project." A nuclear reactor on the moon? I don't get it. Meta spent north of $30 Billions to build a "metaverse" that I would not even consider to be alpha-level quality, and some people at Rolls-Royce think they can build a nuclear reactor for how much?
Meta spent $30 billion on something that looks like SecondLife on the Wii…
But also this ain’t the total cost just how much money the UK government is funding the project for right now.
Re: UK backs Rolls-Royce project to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
#9dumb question maybe, but with out an atmosphere, isn't there virtually unlimited solar potential on the moon? why is a nuclear reactor needed?
Batteries are an option but 14 days worth of storage for a lunar base is probably asking a bit too much.
Also nuclear provides another benefit on the moon - heat which you’ll definitely need during those 14 days of darkness.
Re: UK backs Rolls-Royce project to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
#10dumb question maybe, but with out an atmosphere, isn't there virtually unlimited solar potential on the moon? why is a nuclear reactor needed?