Live data from Hacker News

Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

cnn.com

91–100 of 134 posts

Re: Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is showing a clear misunderstanding of the cause of these low birth rates. If IVF and government run child raising facilities was a real option then they wouldn't need immigrants to do it. Japanese women are not having babies because they don't want to, not because they physically can't. The crisis the rich world is having is that it is no longer possible to raise a family with only a single working adult, and r…

It has nothing to do with "crisis in Western societies". It happens everywhere , including in countries that saw a super massive, skyrocketing (10x+ in one generation) increase of median effective incomes. Simply called a "demographic transition": people are not having kids because they can avoid it (contraception) and because there are no social or economic forces coercing them to have kids. Kids can only meaningful…

You are right about the absurd education requirements. As it stands right now every child born is a luxury that you need to take care of until they finish college (yes they can supplement their income through student jobs but that isn't reliable). So children are now considered a burden in society that need to spend decades on their education and aren't allowed to fail. If you do fail you are considered the scum of society.

I wouldn't want to subject more children to that.

Re: Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

#92
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So the crisis is that there are not enough products and services for an aging population. That's a different crisis than low birth rates, that should be solved differently.

Well until we have robots which can fully replace many/most jobs people do, the only way solve that is by increasing the proportion of working age people to those who are retired. There are no other options. You can do that by either increasing immigration or birth rates. That’s it.

One other (bad) option is raising the retirement age or lowering the start-work age.

Re: Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

#93
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So the crisis is that there are not enough products and services for an aging population. That's a different crisis than low birth rates, that should be solved differently.

Well until we have robots which can fully replace many/most jobs people do, the only way solve that is by increasing the proportion of working age people to those who are retired. There are no other options. You can do that by either increasing immigration or birth rates. That’s it.

Once we have robots doing most jobs, heck why even have babies?

Re: Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> better to stop reproducing and just let things end peacefully? Prisoner's dilemma, I guess. If everyone stops reproducing, the people who keep at it secure more resources for their offspring.

They don't. Look at African countries with up to seven children per family.

Reread the comment I was replying to. This is a hypothetical.

Re: Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

#95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The hell? Japan is no USA or Canada but the discrimination isn't that bad , it's pretty on par with the rest of east Asia except maybe Singapore and certainly better than China.

East Asia is a big place. Taiwan definitely treats its foreigners and ethnic minorities a lot better than Japan. On the other hand, China has concentration camps for its ethnic minorities. Yes Japan doesn’t have concentration camps for Ainu, so I guess they’re doing OK?

Don't know about the ainu, but Okinawans are treated well, though there were decades of language repression -- this was true of Hakka and non-han indigenous population in Taiwan too.

However, gp was about foreign minorities. There have been foreign-born (Caucasian) members of the diet, for example.

I guess the one thing weird about Japan is that there is some expectation of cultural erasure -- if you immigrate and you want to fully assimilate, you have to take a Japanese name.

Re: Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>It has nothing to do with "crisis in Western societies" Yes, which is why I said RICH countries, not western countries. It would have been strange for me to focus on western countries, given that this thread is about Japan. >and because there are no social or economic forces coercing them to have kids. This is kind of implying that the primary reason people have children is for economic reasons, but in wealthy count…

Well, if you take the world overall, birth rates are beyond doubt falling (and are now at or near replacement ratio), while wealth is beyond doubt improving fast and has been for several generations virtually nonstop (even major events like Great Depression or WWII did not stop economic growth for the world overall due to being largely regional).

You should look into Simpson's paradox.

The fall in birthrates is caused by countries going from undeveloped to developed, but within developed countries the birthrate is higher when the economy is stronger.

Re: Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, if you take the world overall, birth rates are beyond doubt falling (and are now at or near replacement ratio), while wealth is beyond doubt improving fast and has been for several generations virtually nonstop (even major events like Great Depression or WWII did not stop economic growth for the world overall due to being largely regional).

You should look into Simpson's paradox. The fall in birthrates is caused by countries going from undeveloped to developed, but within developed countries the birthrate is higher when the economy is stronger.

> within developed countries the birthrate is higher when the economy is stronger.

So ... you're implying that the USofA saw peak economic strength in 1825 and it's been down hill ever since?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1037156/crude-birth-rate...

Re: Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

#98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, if you take the world overall, birth rates are beyond doubt falling (and are now at or near replacement ratio), while wealth is beyond doubt improving fast and has been for several generations virtually nonstop (even major events like Great Depression or WWII did not stop economic growth for the world overall due to being largely regional).

You should look into Simpson's paradox. The fall in birthrates is caused by countries going from undeveloped to developed, but within developed countries the birthrate is higher when the economy is stronger.

That is known to exist indeed, countries in which most people can simply live off social money, like Sweden, have better birth rates. But, all of those countries are below replacement level anyway...

There is no way for a rich country to be above replacement level this days. Their success varies, but it all seems like that being rich is incompatible with having kids. Even in single countries, for which statistics like that is available, birth rates are higher in poorer income groups, like it is in USA. Households making over $200K have 1.5x fewer kids than the poorest households. Both between countries, and within countries, main drivers of reproduction are poverty and low educational attainment.

Re: Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

#99

It's amusing that Japan has become singled out on this, like some kind of a trope, when it's not even at the bottom. Last I heard HK has a fertility rate of 0.7. There is no crisis. There's problems, but not to the level that a mainstream western rag wants to make out. There's a known migratory pattern that once people retire, they don't need to be commuting to an office anymore, and so they move out far from the cit…

It's not about population size, it's about number of working hands to mouths to feed, basically. In a decreasing, ageing population, this fraction becomes rapidly very unattractive.

I feel this article then should actually be viewed in reverse: the old people are shuffling off to the outskirts to leave room & resources for the young.

Re: Community’s 25yrs without a newborn shows scale of Japan’s population crisis

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> However if the pyramid gets flipped where you have way more elderly and retired who need to be sustained financially and need care the system starts to collapse. It is true that the system as currently set up does not cope with inverted population pyramid. Do you change the system or try to force the pyramid to re-invert? Why all the focus seems to be on the latter? Fundamentally, disregarding for a moment how fina…

> what % of working people does it take to support a population This depends on the quality of life for the non-working.

...and the number of people working.

Hence the need to either sacrifice the old, or make more babies.

Post reply on HN