Live data from Hacker News

Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says

bbc.com

321–330 of 382 posts

Re: Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem with honey is that it can cause botulism. Infants under 1 are most susceptible.

Honey is usually sold pasteurized though so botulism wouldn't be an issue. Just don't go for the fancy natural/raw stuff.

I don't think honey is usually pasteurized. It's usually heated in the process of producing a clear product with no grittiness, but that's not necessarily pasteurization.

And botulism spores are incredibly durable.

Re: Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says

#322

As a person from south Asia, one of my big culture shocks moving to west was the allergies. Its almost unheard of in South Asia (at least a decade ago). One another big factor is likely that the heavy daily use of fermented food in South Asia, which was almost complete ly absent (atleast in US)

And feeding young children actually spicy food instead of treating ketchup as the most flavorful ingredient in children's food.

Re: Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says

#323
post #152

Does this effectively confirm the hygiene hypothesis ? The hygiene hypothesis suggests that a newborn baby's immune system must be educated so it will function properly during infancy and the rest of life. I'm weighing the need for my (possible future) children to spend time in a 3rd world country with germs & allergens for a little bit, to avoid heavily sanitized environments throughout their early lives. That's aga…

Hygiene hypothesis is something different.

Re: Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says

#324
We just gave our kid little bits of whatever we were having for dinner, because that's the traditional approach. No need to make special purees.

I have a strong suspicion that not only is there allergy benefit, but also that this is why she ended up not being too picky an eater.

Re: Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says

#325

Earlier quoted context omitted.

you say it like it's a sort of corporate slut-shaming, but it's not. If you build a factory big enough to make 1/2 the cheese puffs in the world, there's an incentive to make it bigger and make all the cheese puffs in the world. Going from small batch bake/frying to assembly line flow is the 1st step, but once you're over that hurdle, you might as well go big, as long as you can handle the risk of being stuck with th…

I have no problem with it myself; but the companies/brands certainly do. Lots of national brands have a "this is not produced in a factory or machine that produces any store brand".

As a kid I think it was Colgate who had a tagline of “We don’t make toothpaste for anyone else”, which utterly confused me at the time

Re: Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says

#326
post #233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's absolutely not backwards. But it is. The best population-level guidance (now) is early exposure. We told people to do the opposite. The result was a lot more kids with anaphylaxis-level allergy. (I don't know if this increased the total number of people who died. That'd be an interesting question, but given that we reversed the guidance, I assume from a public health perspective people now believe the original…

> I think you mean that it's intuitive, but I don't think it's logical, for exactly the reason that it turns out not to be a good idea. If operating with the best model you have is intuitive and not logical, then everything in science it intuitive and not logical, so we might have to redefine your use of "logical" to be more useful. Peanut exposure caused anaphylaxis in some kids. Many kids in the world are never exp…

If operating with the best model you have is intuitive and not logical, then everything in science it intuitive and not logical, so we might have to redefine your use of "logical" to be more useful.

When you're defending a position now known to be wrong, this sort of statement is more rude than it is enlightening (or convincing).

Re: Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says

#327
This seems valid. I'm from a country where a majority of our desserts and cookies are made with various different nuts so kids are exposed very early. We never hear about peanut allergies. When we moved to the US we were shocked that so many people have nut allergies.

Re: Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says

#328

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those are the companies that don't want to admit selling their stuff for cheaper, so they get it store-branded.

you say it like it's a sort of corporate slut-shaming, but it's not. If you build a factory big enough to make 1/2 the cheese puffs in the world, there's an incentive to make it bigger and make all the cheese puffs in the world. Going from small batch bake/frying to assembly line flow is the 1st step, but once you're over that hurdle, you might as well go big, as long as you can handle the risk of being stuck with th…

> That type of cooking is a natural monopoly.

Should bulk cheese puffs be state owned?

Re: Give babies peanut butter to cut peanut allergies, study says

#330

I always wondered how kids end up with pollen allergies. I mean who doesn't take their kid outside in the spring? Or is the offending pollen only endemic to certan areas, so you could grow up in a normal way somewhere and still get it? I'm not strongly allergic to anything, but certain mosquitoes and also horseflies will make the bite swell up a ridiculous amount sometimes. But it never happened with the mosquitoes a…

Infections can trigger autoimmune diseases so I wouldn't be surprised about triggering allergies as well. So not the antibiotic imo but the virus
Post reply on HN