Live data from Hacker News

Is something wrong with Amazon Photos? I lost 240k photos

amazonforum.com

41–50 of 357 posts

Re: Is something wrong with Amazon Photos? I lost 240k photos

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Digikam is the bees knees in digital asset management. I manage my personal photo archive with that, and it punches way above its weight.

Except for it's horrible face recognition right?.. ugh.

I'm away from my desktop computer, but it wasn't half bad when I last updated its DB. I don't take much portraits, so I don't use that feature much, but give it a look when I can and update you.

Re: Is something wrong with Amazon Photos? I lost 240k photos

#42

I love my Synology NAS. It handles photos great: https://www.synology.com/en-us/dsm/feature/photos

I own a Synology NAS, and now believe that it would have been easier to just set up a computer for the tasks I use it for. There are just too many cases where the solution is to use a container (and the clumsy web interfaces for reverse proxying &c), and if I end up SSHing into it too much, I prefer to have a more controllable environment.

It does fit some workflows very well though, you just have to assess if your needs over the next few years fit their business intentions.

Re: Is something wrong with Amazon Photos? I lost 240k photos

#45
post #30

Does anyone know if iCloud (photos) storage is AWS S3? Curious if using both iCloud & Amazon Photos is a decent redundant backup plan in addition to a local copy. Or if I have iCloud & Prime, why not? (I also use Backblaze.)

I believe iCloud uses Google's cloud as storage backend.

Re: Is something wrong with Amazon Photos? I lost 240k photos

#47
post #30

Does anyone know if iCloud (photos) storage is AWS S3? Curious if using both iCloud & Amazon Photos is a decent redundant backup plan in addition to a local copy. Or if I have iCloud & Prime, why not? (I also use Backblaze.)

What if a strong solar EMP wipe all storages on earth? you need redundancy on at least two other planets (I would suggest the moon but it's close to earth)

Re: Is something wrong with Amazon Photos? I lost 240k photos

#48
post #4
post #2

Pop goes the photo cache, all my family photos mysteriously vanish into the depths of Amazon Photos

Is that your only backup? Because precious photos need more than one (like any backup regime really) Still it sucks and it shouldn’t happen, hopefully it’s just a reporting error in the app.

Sharing my family-photo-backup system:

- Synology NAS is accessible on LAN & phones sync photos when at home

- Nightly rsync from internal NAS storage to 1 external (non-raid) hard drive

The nightly rsync does not delete files, so the external hard drive is pretty close to an off-site backup even though it's still attached. The only better thing I've thought of doing is mounting it ro after backups + re-mounting before backups.

At the end of the day we get 3 copies of data: the photo on your phone, the photo on the shared NAS, and the photo on an external hard drive that spends 99% of its life spun down.

Re: Is something wrong with Amazon Photos? I lost 240k photos

#50

It literally only has been 1 hour since OP posted that thread. I agree with all the points about having backups and/or using better service/self host etc., but IMO it's too early to conclude anything about this incident.

And a follow-up will likely not make the front page.
Post reply on HN