Live data from Hacker News

How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

cs.princeton.edu

11–20 of 171 posts

Re: How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

#11
I'm curious why they haven't done more forensic typographic analysis of the fonts themselves. There are a number of images of actual Selectric fonts, including [1], and that includes symbols and other variations. Close examination would either confirm the use of that equipment, or else discrepancies would be a valuable clue.

Thomas Phinney, Font Detective[2] is the first person I'd ask, as he's done this professionally, though I have done a bit of it myself.

[1]: http://luc.devroye.org/fonts-44934.html

[2]: https://thefontdetective.com/

Re: How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

#12
Maybe a time traveler.

Remember, there were people scraping the Internet looking for things that were posted that might indicate someone was a time traveler?

Maybe Dennis Ritchie was given some advanced information and given access to advanced technology (US security service that someone else mentioned)?

Something fun to think about.

Re: How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

#13
post #10

> It appears that Dennis was able to replace incorrect copy with new text in the surrounding original copy, but note the extra space in the corrected version. Other than corrections, the January and February versions are identical in every way: February is not a new version, but a copy of the January draft except for corrections. ... The natural explanation is that he used white-out and a Xerox copy machine. Except t…

Sure, but why leave the extra space there after retyping it? Still possible though.

Re: How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

#14
We have no idea how it would even be possible to make these horizontal adjustments with the typing machines of the time.

I agree with the other comment here that the authors haven't used a typewriter, or at least in enough detail to know that on many if not all of them, holding down the spacebar will advance the carriage by half a character (and releasing it, in normal use, advances the other half.)

Re: How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

#15
post #8

"The braces are not perfect— clearly they have been done by hand—but they are very precise" There were plastic template stencils/rulers that let you draw great looking braces.

Possible. These kinds of templates were the standard tool for drawing engineering schematic symbols (like transistors or logic gates) before CAD.

Re: How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

#16
I thought that his thesis disappeared because he had military connections and this stuff was too good to share with potential enemies. That would also explain how he could white-out and copy a document before xerox became widely available. The military probably had early access to the technology needed to duplicate documents, such as maps or code tables.

Re: How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

#17
This is a non-mystery. It looks like this was done with a Selectric typewriter using two typeballs, one of them "Symbols 10", and the other for text.[1]

The reason there are two versions of "4" is because you could type something like "(4.10)" with either the regular typeball or the Symbols ball. Both have numbers, parentheses, upper case letters, and a period/decimal point. Switching typeballs takes a few seconds, so it's only done when necessary.

There was a little lever on some Selectrics which displaced the carriage horizontally by half a space.[2] So, if you really needed half spacing, it was available. But you had to hold the spring-loaded lever in place while typing, so this was rarely used. It was used for fixing typos by erasing two characters and squeezing in three. It was also possible to move the paper a half-line vertically.

This is tedious work, and there were pro typists who did it for money. This was a manual job.

All this is on Google.

[1] https://www.duxburysystems.org/downloads/library/texas/apple...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Selectric_typewriter

Re: How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

#18
For sake of reference, in the 1950s my parents both took their theses to a typist, which was the standard operating procedure. You could do it yourself, but multiple copies were needed, and only a typist could do it accurately enough to trust themselves with carbon paper. Correcting mistakes on carbons was a mess.

Chemical diagrams, graphs, and equations, were all done by hand.

Theses were shorter.

Re: How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

#19

For sake of reference, in the 1950s my parents both took their theses to a typist, which was the standard operating procedure. You could do it yourself, but multiple copies were needed, and only a typist could do it accurately enough to trust themselves with carbon paper. Correcting mistakes on carbons was a mess. Chemical diagrams, graphs, and equations, were all done by hand. Theses were shorter.

In the late 60s, my mother typed my father's thesis -- because she knew how to touch type and he didn't.

Re: How did Dennis Ritchie produce his PhD thesis? A typographical mystery (2022) [pdf]

#20
post #17

This is a non-mystery. It looks like this was done with a Selectric typewriter using two typeballs, one of them "Symbols 10", and the other for text.[1] The reason there are two versions of "4" is because you could type something like "(4.10)" with either the regular typeball or the Symbols ball. Both have numbers, parentheses, upper case letters, and a period/decimal point. Switching typeballs takes a few seconds, s…

Amusingly there was a word processor called T3, which emulated the Selectric. The Alt button (if I recall correctly, since I used it for my thesis in 1993) switched to the Symbol type ball. Some combination of arrows moved the cursor up and down by a half line. There were macros for some big symbols like the integral and sum.

After a bit of practice, it was remarkably quick for doing equations. It used its own font, that looked like a mono-spaced Times Roman.

Post reply on HN