Live data from Hacker News

NASA unveils new moon suit

forth.news

21–30 of 71 posts

Re: NASA unveils new moon suit

#21
I don't like this link. I've never heard of "forth.news" and the article is extremely brief and weird looking.

Here's the official NASA channel video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5KnOtI4fS3U

Also NYTimes and CBS News articles:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/15/science/nasa-moon-suit-as...

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/nasa-axiom-space-spacesuit-...

Re: NASA unveils new moon suit

#22
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NASA's Artemis program is generally on track - Artemis 1 (uncrewed test flight into lunar orbit which then returned to Earth) was successful in 2022. Artemis 2 (humans going into lunar orbit) is scheduled for next year, and indications seem to be that it's on track. Artemis 3 (humans landing on the moon) is scheduled for 2025. So there has been very tangible progress in the form of Artemis 1, plus the schedule is to…

Starship will be the rocket delivering them to the surface. It is likely to have a first orbital test within the next 3 months. That will be a major milestone, approaching the capability to once again land and return humans from the lunar surface.

[dead]

Re: NASA unveils new moon suit

#24

[flagged]

> but did we really go to the moon?

We left mirrors on the moon. You can aim lasers at it and detect the reflection back to Earth:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jun/21/mcdonald-...

There is other physical evidence that was left behind like a rover, flag, footprints, etc, that can be seen from moon-orbiting satellites.

Re: NASA unveils new moon suit

#25
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NASA's Artemis program is generally on track - Artemis 1 (uncrewed test flight into lunar orbit which then returned to Earth) was successful in 2022. Artemis 2 (humans going into lunar orbit) is scheduled for next year, and indications seem to be that it's on track. Artemis 3 (humans landing on the moon) is scheduled for 2025. So there has been very tangible progress in the form of Artemis 1, plus the schedule is to…

Starship will be the rocket delivering them to the surface. It is likely to have a first orbital test within the next 3 months. That will be a major milestone, approaching the capability to once again land and return humans from the lunar surface.

[deleted]

Re: NASA unveils new moon suit

#26
post #15

[flagged]

YES we (well some highly trained and lucky astronauts) went to the moon. It's like your assuming all of the landers NASA and other countries have landed on Mars and Venus are fake too.

Not only that but the moon missions happened during the height of the Cold War. The Soviets were watching very closely and would have loved to have shown the world the US faked the moon landings.

Re: NASA unveils new moon suit

#27
I love the idea of the Lunar Gateway space station's extreme orbit, which will allow astronauts to travel quickly between the station and the surface of the Moon with relatively low power consumption. "Attention all taking the 9:30 to Mare Serenitatis, please mind the gap between the platform and the capsule!"

Re: NASA unveils new moon suit

#28
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NASA's Artemis program is generally on track - Artemis 1 (uncrewed test flight into lunar orbit which then returned to Earth) was successful in 2022. Artemis 2 (humans going into lunar orbit) is scheduled for next year, and indications seem to be that it's on track. Artemis 3 (humans landing on the moon) is scheduled for 2025. So there has been very tangible progress in the form of Artemis 1, plus the schedule is to…

Starship will be the rocket delivering them to the surface. It is likely to have a first orbital test within the next 3 months. That will be a major milestone, approaching the capability to once again land and return humans from the lunar surface.

What I don't understand is why is the SLS being used to transport the humans to lunar orbit but the Starship HLS is supposed to take them to the surface? Why not just ride the Starship the whole way?

Re: NASA unveils new moon suit

#29

[flagged]

So after the moon landings public interest started fading quickly for space programs. NASA didn't have enough funds to both continue Apollo programs and develop the Space Shuttle so they wound down Apollo early to best use the budget they had. When a large program like that ends production is shut down, people leave companies and the unique skill sets required to build those products disappears.

So yeah truly we just haven't had a compelling enough interest to devote the necessary funds to go back. Also the Moon doesn't offer super unique research opportunities.

Also there is some incredibly interesting reading on the Russian Moon program. Your belief that they didn't want to go says that largely the effort to cover up their failed moon program was mostly a success towards the average person. The Russian spent a ton of money on their N1 rocket which failed on launch 4 times and then was cancelled and they ordered everything be destroyed.

Re: NASA unveils new moon suit

#30
post #17

[flagged]

Reasons we never went back: 1) It was principally a national pride competition between the US and USSR so when the US succeeded there wasn't much of a reason to go there. We gathered loads of rocks for all the science we could want to do for a long time (they're still cracking open fresh samples to this day). 2) There's not that much economically or scientifically on the moon to really investigate that needs people t…

We did it last time in a lot less time taking far more risks. I think the majority is the lack of political or economic incentives, but there is something to the idea that our current culture is much more risk averse, and probably less good at "just make it work" projects than it used to be.
Post reply on HN