Live data from Hacker News

Alpaca: A strong open-source instruction-following model

crfm.stanford.edu

1–10 of 313 posts

Re: Alpaca: A strong open-source instruction-following model

#3
https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/03/13/alpaca.html They say they'll release the weights. But Of course, you'll be beholden to a non-commercial license. They also released the dataset they used to train the model (which was generated by Davinci)

I wonder why Meta didn't just train the 7b and 13b models on the full 1.4T tokens. They curves show they weren't even close to converging. Shame really.

Re: Alpaca: A strong open-source instruction-following model

#4

https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/03/13/alpaca.html They say they'll release the weights. But Of course, you'll be beholden to a non-commercial license. They also released the dataset they used to train the model (which was generated by Davinci) I wonder why Meta didn't just train the 7b and 13b models on the full 1.4T tokens. They curves show they weren't even close to converging. Shame really.

I am not a lawyer, but the consensus (around here anyway) seems to be that weights cannot be copyrighted since they are the output of an automated process, so perhaps the license cannot limit how the weights are used. The code can be copyrighted, but the code can also be reimplemented from scratch and used to load the weights.

Re: Alpaca: A strong open-source instruction-following model

#5

https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/03/13/alpaca.html They say they'll release the weights. But Of course, you'll be beholden to a non-commercial license. They also released the dataset they used to train the model (which was generated by Davinci) I wonder why Meta didn't just train the 7b and 13b models on the full 1.4T tokens. They curves show they weren't even close to converging. Shame really.

They probably did but didn't release them for the public.

Re: Alpaca: A strong open-source instruction-following model

#7

https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/03/13/alpaca.html They say they'll release the weights. But Of course, you'll be beholden to a non-commercial license. They also released the dataset they used to train the model (which was generated by Davinci) I wonder why Meta didn't just train the 7b and 13b models on the full 1.4T tokens. They curves show they weren't even close to converging. Shame really.

I am not a lawyer, but the consensus (around here anyway) seems to be that weights cannot be copyrighted since they are the output of an automated process, so perhaps the license cannot limit how the weights are used. The code can be copyrighted, but the code can also be reimplemented from scratch and used to load the weights.

Just because they cannot be copyrighted doesn’t mean that they cannot be considered a trade secret. The agreement for using the product could done with an NDA. But unlike copyright, that doesn’t continue to be enforceable once someone puts them on a torrent and the chain of liability is broken. /notalawyereither

Re: Alpaca: A strong open-source instruction-following model

#8
Pretty exciting to see the democratization of this tech.

The next wave of innovation seems like it’ll be much less centralized into a handful of big companies. Even more powerful closed door LLMs will appear, but already so much utility out of these that can run on consumer hardware.

Re: Alpaca: A strong open-source instruction-following model

#9
Here's a link that opens their training data (52,000 rows) in Datasette Lite: https://lite.datasette.io/?json=https://github.com/tatsu-lab...

Means you can run SQL LIKE queries against it to try and get a feel for what's in there.

This link includes a query for running searches for terms: https://lite.datasette.io/?json=https://github.com/tatsu-lab...

Re: Alpaca: A strong open-source instruction-following model

#10

https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/03/13/alpaca.html They say they'll release the weights. But Of course, you'll be beholden to a non-commercial license. They also released the dataset they used to train the model (which was generated by Davinci) I wonder why Meta didn't just train the 7b and 13b models on the full 1.4T tokens. They curves show they weren't even close to converging. Shame really.

I am not a lawyer, but the consensus (around here anyway) seems to be that weights cannot be copyrighted since they are the output of an automated process, so perhaps the license cannot limit how the weights are used. The code can be copyrighted, but the code can also be reimplemented from scratch and used to load the weights.

God damn I hope this is where IP law lands. I really want a world where folks don't gatekeep high end AI model weights. Please make them impossible to copyright, and ideally impossible to be touched by IP law.
Post reply on HN