11–20 of 27 posts
This infographic is like watching a politician spin their selfish agenda into a "think of the children!" plea. Pretty funny actually.
(Not knowing much about web marketing and SEO, I feel like I'm missing a lot of the context to understand this topic.)
The takeaway from this seems to be that Google no longer rewards attempts to game its SERPs. I can't help but think of this as a good thing.
The issue here is that it's still really easy to game SERPs, it just takes more money to do so and a willingness to step in gray hat territory. Search plus your world has the potential to make it very hard if not impossible to game SERPs, however. The takeaway from the infographic should really be that Aaron Wall (of seobook.com) runs a business that teaches (white hat?) SEO to small business owners. It's in his best…
I am tired of "marketers" posting content here, and I suggest that we should downvote the post and upload the image at an imagehost.
Anyone know the rationale behind this one? How does this help in fighting the spam? Or how does it improve search experience?
Could be great for a little games company like mine. I make very niche games and have no hope of being ranked for a term like "strategy game". I hope that if people are talking us in their circles we might get a few more hits.
Original source: http://www.seobook.com/learn-seo/infographics/longtail-fail....
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The issue here is that it's still really easy to game SERPs, it just takes more money to do so and a willingness to step in gray hat territory. Search plus your world has the potential to make it very hard if not impossible to game SERPs, however. The takeaway from the infographic should really be that Aaron Wall (of seobook.com) runs a business that teaches (white hat?) SEO to small business owners. It's in his best…
Being knowledgable in internet marketing, the first thing I spotted was that the context of this article is to be an advertisement at hackernews et al. I am tired of "marketers" posting content here, and I suggest that we should downvote the post and upload the image at an imagehost.
I'm guessing you're also vehemently against copyright laws.
Also, with a new account you're talking about advertisement at hackernews and being tired of marketers posting content here?
I'm just fascinated by how 80% of all complaints about the degrading quality of HN come from new users.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being knowledgable in internet marketing, the first thing I spotted was that the context of this article is to be an advertisement at hackernews et al. I am tired of "marketers" posting content here, and I suggest that we should downvote the post and upload the image at an imagehost.
So you're tired of "marketers", yet you think the image has some value, so you want to rip it off the origin website to remove the attribution? I'm guessing you're also vehemently against copyright laws. Also, with a new account you're talking about advertisement at hackernews and being tired of marketers posting content here ? I'm just fascinated by how 80% of all complaints about the degrading quality of HN come fr…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you're tired of "marketers", yet you think the image has some value, so you want to rip it off the origin website to remove the attribution? I'm guessing you're also vehemently against copyright laws. Also, with a new account you're talking about advertisement at hackernews and being tired of marketers posting content here ? I'm just fascinated by how 80% of all complaints about the degrading quality of HN come fr…
Their username looks like random keyboard mashing, so it's likely a regular who doesn't want the comment associated with their usual profile.
And while I get the need for anonymity, people really need to grow some balls and stand-up by their beliefs.
This infographic is like watching a politician spin their selfish agenda into a "think of the children!" plea. Pretty funny actually.
How so? (Not knowing much about web marketing and SEO, I feel like I'm missing a lot of the context to understand this topic.)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their username looks like random keyboard mashing, so it's likely a regular who doesn't want the comment associated with their usual profile.
Or maybe a username that got (hell) banned. And while I get the need for anonymity, people really need to grow some balls and stand-up by their beliefs.
