Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't really know much about venture capital but this sounds like a gross oversimplification. More like, the startups that are saved will be a mixed bag of worthwhile startups and dead-end startups. Meanwhile some worthwhile ones will sadly be left behind with the dead-end ones.
Depends on your perspective. One of the articles of faith in this industry is that good startups get investment and succeed, while bad ones fail. To whatever extent that's true, it won't be particularly worse here. Startups who made treasury management errors and are experiencing cash crunches can make very good cases for bridge loans and extra investment from their existing investors. If their investors are like, "n…
Aside from that timing is always a thing. There's certainly a company out there that is 8 months away from proving the soundness of their idea that now only has six months of funding, or whatever.
The idea that in every case, "the market" or whatever will arrive at the most perfectly correct conclusion is silly at any time, but particularly in one of uncertainty and upheaval.