Live data from Hacker News

Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout

ft.com

61–70 of 1001 posts

Re: Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My guess ( I havn't looked at is the last ones ) is that the majority of deposits were well under 250k, and that hundreds of thousands of jobs weren't on the line. Also, you are talking about a major banking collapse if people start thinking that their deposits aren't safe. (a lot of people will start pulling money, even if under 250k). There are so many irrational people out there... edit: I guess somewhere in what…

With this place the majority were over 250k. Something like 97% or something. It was a big bank for businesses. Why they were bizarrely keeping such large sums in one bank account I don’t understand. Roku had almost $500 million there.

[deleted]

Re: Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout

#63
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did they help depositors that lost money in the last 500+ bank collapses? Why do they get special treatment? The government has laws and rules the depositors are insured up to 250k. Either they liquidate and everyone takes a hair cut. Or they wait till the bonds mature and can pay them out. But the government should not relieve anyone past what is legally available.

Because there was a systemic risks. You let one bank collapse, OK. If the collapse causes other banks to collapse then it's bad. When WalMart, Costco can't transfer money to fill shelves, people go hungry. When people can't get their wages, they go hungry.

Then, at least be fair and nationalize the big banks.

There's no point pretending that the large banks are "private" if they are subjected to some special rules.

People put their money there willingly, no one forced them to. Let them all feel the joys of "free market capitalism".

Re: Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout

#64
post #26

Good. Investors like Ackman and Cuban seem so concerned about payroll for tech workers. The truth is that the vast majority of this cash was dry powder for acquisitions, staying liquid for new new investments, fresh VC money for advertising. Isn’t it these same folks who remind us all the time that most startups fail? Why bail out an entire bank when 99% of its startup depositors wouldn’t have made it anyway? If anyt…

> The truth is that the vast majority of this cash was dry powder for acquisitions, staying liquid for new new investments, fresh VC money for advertising

Any sources for this? This seems like an opinion with nothing backing it up.

> Isn’t it these same folks who remind us all the time that most startups fail?

There is a big difference between a single startup being able to fail at any time and many of them failing all at once.

Re: Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout

#65
post #7

This actually makes a ton of sense, lets not forget that a bailout in this term is really pointing towards saving the bank itself, and its shareholders. There is inherent risk in equity investments, and it likely should have to suffer for its poor decisions. But when it comes to depositors, I think it makes a lot of sense to make them whole, especially in the case of SVB where the bank likely has pretty close to enou…

Did they help depositors that lost money in the last 500+ bank collapses? Why do they get special treatment? The government has laws and rules the depositors are insured up to 250k. Either they liquidate and everyone takes a hair cut. Or they wait till the bonds mature and can pay them out. But the government should not relieve anyone past what is legally available.

> Did they help depositors that lost money in the last 500+ bank collapses?

Yes. Anything else?

Re: Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout

#66

It’s still not clear to me, are they making the depositors whole?

Yes, it's share holders who will realize the loss. Anyone owed money by the bank, ie depositors is now in a line to be paid as the FDIC sells everything and pays out the obligations.

Re: Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout

#67
post #59
post #7

This actually makes a ton of sense, lets not forget that a bailout in this term is really pointing towards saving the bank itself, and its shareholders. There is inherent risk in equity investments, and it likely should have to suffer for its poor decisions. But when it comes to depositors, I think it makes a lot of sense to make them whole, especially in the case of SVB where the bank likely has pretty close to enou…

> But when it comes to depositors, I think it makes a lot of sense to make them whole, especially in the case of SVB where the bank likely has pretty close to enough assets to cover the liabilities (deposits), but its tied up in such long term investments that it could take a long time to get it out. If anybody gets an extra penny more than $250K from the Feds than that is by definition a bailout. > But moreso, when…

> FDIC insurance is not infinite. Not understanding that is no fault of the rest of society.

I think we should really not forget that SVB hit duration risk on their assets that is almost definitionally not an issue for the FDIC. This isn’t “bank fell apart due to bad loans” this is “bank fell apart because money is locked away for 10 years but is basically guaranteed”.

Basically no risk to taxpayers!

Re: Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My guess ( I havn't looked at is the last ones ) is that the majority of deposits were well under 250k, and that hundreds of thousands of jobs weren't on the line. Also, you are talking about a major banking collapse if people start thinking that their deposits aren't safe. (a lot of people will start pulling money, even if under 250k). There are so many irrational people out there... edit: I guess somewhere in what…

With this place the majority were over 250k. Something like 97% or something. It was a big bank for businesses. Why they were bizarrely keeping such large sums in one bank account I don’t understand. Roku had almost $500 million there.

SVB claimed the money is in treasury bills not just cash in the account. Which is a completely sensible place to put it.

Re: Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules out bailout

#70
post #42
post #26

Good. Investors like Ackman and Cuban seem so concerned about payroll for tech workers. The truth is that the vast majority of this cash was dry powder for acquisitions, staying liquid for new new investments, fresh VC money for advertising. Isn’t it these same folks who remind us all the time that most startups fail? Why bail out an entire bank when 99% of its startup depositors wouldn’t have made it anyway? If anyt…

> Good. Investors like Ackman and Cuban seem so concerned about payroll for tech workers. ? The truth is that the vast majority of this cash was dry powder for acquisitions, staying liquid for new new investments, fresh VC money for advertising. You seem confused. The "cash" you're talking about here is the deposited cash, which Yellen is saying will get funded. I think you're confusing that with bank equity.

Cash flow is currently the issue for many businesses.

They literally cannot afford to pay people on Monday if their deposits are not returned.

Post reply on HN