Urgent: Sign the petition now
31–40 of 864 posts
Re: Urgent: Sign the petition now
#32LOL, nope. Not interested in taking another spin on the “privatize gain, socialize loss” merry-go-round. The banks had to be saved in 2008 because they were, like, the financial system. I don’t see why private companies and funds that are much less integral to the functioning of the economy as a whole should be saved by the public fisc. Sorry about your disruption.
Re: Urgent: Sign the petition now
#33Less regulation equals more cases of failures like SVB.
Striking a good balance is hard. It‘s certainly not zero regulation.
Re: Urgent: Sign the petition now
#34Re: Urgent: Sign the petition now
#35Re: Urgent: Sign the petition now
#36I don't get the sense there is a lot of sympathy from HN over this event. People lost money, payroll may be missed, that's a detrimental thing for a lot of people. If little sympathy, why?
May they burn brightly.
Re: Urgent: Sign the petition now
#37Key paragraph:
> "All insured depositors will have full access to their insured deposits no later than Monday morning, March 13, 2023. The FDIC will pay uninsured depositors an advance dividend within the next week. Uninsured depositors will receive a receivership certificate for the remaining amount of their uninsured funds. As the FDIC sells the assets of Silicon Valley Bank, future dividend payments may be made to uninsured depositors."
The advance dividend presumably should protect most of the small-business account holders from imminently missing payroll. Presumably after that, there will be a secondary market in receivership certificates, and the question will be how much of a discount these trade at relative to the original account balances.
It's still a bad situation to be in, but it shouldn't be as thoroughly catastrophic as many seem to think.
Re: Urgent: Sign the petition now
#38“YC Is Asking for a Bailout”
Re: Urgent: Sign the petition now
#39Re: Urgent: Sign the petition now
#40LOL, nope. Not interested in taking another spin on the “privatize gain, socialize loss” merry-go-round. The banks had to be saved in 2008 because they were, like, the financial system. I don’t see why private companies and funds that are much less integral to the functioning of the economy as a whole should be saved by the public fisc. Sorry about your disruption.
Are you saying if I deposit more than $250k (which is NOT a lot for a business) into a reputable and regulated US bank at negligible rates of interest I should just accept the impact of the bank shutting down due to events unrelated to my actions and choices? And that my deposit should vanish into thin air?