Live data from Hacker News

FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

fdic.gov

151–160 of 1001 posts

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#151

Does this mean $SIVB stock holders who had $265 shares two days ago now have worthless shares? JFC no wonder bank stocks are priced so low compared to earnings... You're just hoping the dividends pay out enough before the inevitable implosion.

They will be getting something but probably close to pennies on the dollar. Depends on how it gets repackaged and sold.

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#153

> Silicon Valley Bank is the first FDIC-insured institution to fail this year. Wow FDIC is fully calling it a failed bank. Just yesterday they were releasing statements saying they’re in a good position. Uncle Sam just fully opened Pandora’s box and made the judgement public!

That's pretty normal for confidence based stuff like this. There isn't really a point in regulators/insurers releasing a "well we're about half confident" message. So it flips from full confidence to zero confidence. Bit jarring but the sharp transition is not unexpected.

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I bet a lot of VCs had significant money in that bank as well. Even if companies could raise money, there wouldn't be as money available.

> a lot of VCs had significant money in that bank Everyone I know pulled yesterday.

Everyone who can read a balance sheet could figure out there was a lot of trouble after the announcement of the sold securities for a significant loss. The VCs telling portfolio companies to ride it out may have been looking for bagholders to ensure that they can get their own money out.

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bill Ackman and Wall Street calling for a government bailout for all depositors: https://twitter.com/BillAckman/status/1634032841687285761

I can't see that happening in today's political climate. Imagine the stories juxtaposing coddled tech workers against the cost of the bailout.

And what is the cost of the bailout, oh sage?

> As of December 31, 2022, Silicon Valley Bank had approximately $209.0 billion in total assets and about $175.4 billion in total deposits

I have a hard time believing they lost 20% of their assets in the last 70 days. The shortfall, if any, should be minor.

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#156
post #4

Oh dear. It guess this is how the VC pyramid scheme collapses. $151BN uninsured deposits in the bank. [0] Now all those unprofitable startups will be falling like dominoes as now the money is tied up in the bank with withdrawals disabled. [0] https://twitter.com/FedGuy12/status/1634038788468113408

You're getting downvoted because people are upset, but this is a real problem that could have been avoided. We'll come out of it stronger, but its going to hurt.

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Keep in mind 93% of SVB's assest were not FDIC insured. >> Silicon Valley Bank Had About $209.0B in Assets I'm not an expert, but aren't deposits in a bank liabilities ? Assets are things like treasury bills and loans held by the bank.

When someone opens a bank account and makes a cash deposit, he/she surrenders the legal title to the cash, and it becomes an asset of the bank.

[deleted]

Re: FDIC Takes over Silicon Valley Bank

#160

Turns out Twitter making bank failure a meme didn’t really help anything at all. It’ll be very interesting to see what happens to uninsured depositors

Probably a dumb question, but what determines if a deposit is insured or not at an FDIC insured bank?

* Amount less than $250k * "Deposit Account" => not a "fancy investment interest account"

Details: https://www.fdic.gov/resources/deposit-insurance/

Not Covered: https://www.fdic.gov/resources/deposit-insurance/financial-p...

Post reply on HN