The Evolution of Motorola Phones
businessinsider.com
The Evolution of Motorola Phones
1–10 of 49 posts
Re: The Evolution of Motorola Phones
#2Re: The Evolution of Motorola Phones
#3Re: The Evolution of Motorola Phones
#4Re: The Evolution of Motorola Phones
#5Re: The Evolution of Motorola Phones
#6The company basically looked like it was gonna die any day. Then RAZR happened. The swaths of incompetents had no idea how to leverage the success, but oh man they were able to spend great swathes of money on terrible ideas over the next few years.
Probably the pinnacle of this incompetency was collaborating with Steve Jobs on the first iTunes enabled phone (ROKR). Basically Moto management opened the doors to Apple/Jobs on how to build cell phones - gave full access to Apple's engineering teams with virtually no upside for Moto but lots for Apple.
RORK was a dud. Then iPhone came out a couple years later. I still remember the COO/CEOs downplaying it in town halls, saying things like "Where's the keyboard! No one is ever going to use a touch screen based device!". Of course, all the engineers knew the writing was on the wall - the iPhone was amazing.
Re: The Evolution of Motorola Phones
#7Little weird that, for such a simple article, they completely cut out phones between the Droid and new Razr. I thought the Moto X was iconic. Being able to customize it and buy it online was pretty big at the time.
Re: The Evolution of Motorola Phones
#8It's not talked about much, but RAZR was a skunk works program inside of Moto started by a small group of engineers independent of management. By that point the company had been largely taken over by cost cutting style management. Lean/6 Sigma was everywhere, and pretty much all research/innovation centres were being shut down. C level was incredibly incompetent. Ed Zander, the most incompetent choice of all, was app…
Only thing holding it back was the sluggish SW and terrible UX, but that plagued most phones of the era.
>C level was incredibly incompetent.
Please name me a major western consumer electronics company of the era other than Apple that didn't have incompetents at the helm.
Nortel, Nokia, Blackberry, Ericsson, Siemens, Alcatel, Philips, all these phone makers are extinct. They all failed to see the writing on the wall that mobile HW is becoming a commodity and the SW and UX will make the difference. The original iPod proved this. It was built with off-the-shelf parts that every hardware maker had access to. Same with the original iPhone. Just off-the-shelf parts and the secret sauce was in the SW not the HW.
It feels like the only way to get to C level is to be as incompetent as possible.
Re: The Evolution of Motorola Phones
#93g, 1mpix rear camera with video, front camera, stereo speakers, properly located gaming controls, Bluetooth, apps, UIQ2 so you could add a full-screen touch keyboard, opera web browser with flash javascript and landscape, vcal/vcard/sync, divx, big screen, personalJava, USB, microsd, dockable stylus, and a huge (at the time) battery.
At the time, even stereo speakers were a big deal. This was years ahead of most other phones
Re: The Evolution of Motorola Phones
#10It's not talked about much, but RAZR was a skunk works program inside of Moto started by a small group of engineers independent of management. By that point the company had been largely taken over by cost cutting style management. Lean/6 Sigma was everywhere, and pretty much all research/innovation centres were being shut down. C level was incredibly incompetent. Ed Zander, the most incompetent choice of all, was app…
The iPhone allowed normies to ruin everything. Instead of programs, we have apps. Instead of websites, we have walled gardens. Instead of bbs systems and forums, we have IG, Facebook and TikTok. Blame the normies.
Edit: Your downvotes mean nothing to me. I've seen what makes you upvote.