Earlier quoted context omitted.
If someone is not already using the holy trinity (AWS/Azure/GCP) there is probably a reason.
I'm not using gcp anymore because it's not worth risk losing access to my personal gmail account just to play around with pet projects. I might be paranoid, but I just don't feel comfortable when there's so much in play.
Reliability: It’s not great
141–150 of 476 posts
Re: Reliability: It’s not great
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
The amount of EU companies following this law is exactly 0.
I know I've personally spent a large portion of my time updating systems to be compliant in the last few years, in North American companies.
Re: Reliability: It’s not great
#143I'm not a user of Fly.io. I can't help but notice how remarkable the effect of open communication on potential end users like me. I remember reading about their reliability problems on HN some time ago. That biased my view of the company. After reading this, the open communication and transparency restored my trust in them, and would make them again a potential candidate for future projects. Because now I know that t…
Agreed, this is how company communication should be. I don't use Fly but would consider them in the future even given their recent issues. I look at this in contrast to Twitter who had/has? an outage today. Their leadership is opaque and doesn't take responsibility for the issues they are causing.
Re: Reliability: It’s not great
#144Fundamentally I think some of the problems come down to the difference between what Fly set out to build and what the market currently want. Fly (to my understanding) at its core is about edge compute. That is where they started and what the team are most excited about developing. It's a brilliant idea, they have the skills and expertise. They are going to be successful at it. However, at the same time the market is…
This is spot on. I found myself using Fly for a project because it was super easy, not because I needed edge compute. TBH it's still actually unclear to me who needs edge compute? What apps require this sort of infra? It's not 99% of web apps right?
Re: Reliability: It’s not great
#145I'm not a user of Fly.io. I can't help but notice how remarkable the effect of open communication on potential end users like me. I remember reading about their reliability problems on HN some time ago. That biased my view of the company. After reading this, the open communication and transparency restored my trust in them, and would make them again a potential candidate for future projects. Because now I know that t…
Re: Reliability: It’s not great
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not using gcp anymore because it's not worth risk losing access to my personal gmail account just to play around with pet projects. I might be paranoid, but I just don't feel comfortable when there's so much in play.
Create a new Gmail account?
Re: Reliability: It’s not great
#147I'm not a user of Fly.io. I can't help but notice how remarkable the effect of open communication on potential end users like me. I remember reading about their reliability problems on HN some time ago. That biased my view of the company. After reading this, the open communication and transparency restored my trust in them, and would make them again a potential candidate for future projects. Because now I know that t…
This is probably therapy, but your message and fly.io's post resonates a lot with what I'm going through. I took a product owner role about 6 months ago, my first, with a company that has turned out to be just a mired mess, and a product universally hated both internally and externally. Long story short, it's completely over-engineered by a bunch of intellectual engineers with no focus, no discipline, and no oversigh…
Re: Reliability: It’s not great
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't even understand what you mean as the difference between "something like RDS" and "something like CrunchyData" -- they seem like similar products to me?
I see RDS as the absolute bare minimum for a managed database; providers like Timescale or Crunchy tend to add some pretty useful stuff on top.
(Timescale -- I think i know, it adds features specifically about storing time series? But I don't think crunchy has additional domain-specific stuff like this? What are the pretty useful features folks find in crunchy that RDS lacks?)
Re: Reliability: It’s not great
#149Well, I feel for them. Scaling up is a bitch. I've been lucky, in the past, but a lot of that, is because I have "overengineered," and the tools/frameworks have advanced to meet the new demand. I am in the middle of a complete, bottom-to-top rewrite of the app we've been developing for the last couple of years. It's going great, but making this leap was a fraught decision. It's mainly, so I wouldn't have to write a p…
Re: Reliability: It’s not great
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
We're nowhere even within the line of sight of closing up shop. We just haven't been doing a good job of aggressively communicating (a) when things go wrong and (b) what we're doing to account for it. The Fly.io of 2023 looks almost nothing like that of 2021 (all for the better), and it's not obvious to our users what's changed. We've been doing a shitty job of communicating, and we're taking our licks for it now.
A lot can happen in 11 years :-) And thanks a lot for fly.io -- it's working great for my (rather small) use cases.