Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, consider it. I can: 1 - Pay my 20-year-experience lawyer 1000 USD an hour to draft me a customized EULA that respect GDPR, works in UK and US, and contains specific provisions about no-no use-cases, IP of content created and what happens when you don't pay your license fees. Lawyer takes 4 hours to produce mediocre output that will require another 8 hours to revise (because he's smart like that), and I pay him…
> If you are saying you couldn't do that with ChatGPT (law version~~coming soon!) then I'd say in fact it is _you_ sir who is out of touch with reality, and clearly have not used ChatGPT in any serious capacity whatsoever. Good day to you sir! The fact that either way a human lawyer is still getting involved in reviewing the output already tells me that not even you can fully trust ChatGPT or any other so-called AI t…
Legal safety thing is why you have to get a lawyer involved, but the same thing is true for any juniors work. I mean, this thing is a fucking junior it's not a genius, but the fact that it's a junior at almost everything makes it a kind of genius and one that you can use. So that's the fucking hype, man! if you are like misrepresenting or not aware of the hype, or you just wanna dismiss it, well bah humbug to you! because you're missing out. But I hope you give it a try because it's wonderful. But it's not a panacea and I think we need to be cautious, but not about the stuff that maybe you're being cautious about; we probably need less of that caution and more of the caution of, "well, how the fuck is this thing going to bite us in the ass like you know 18 months later, and what's the second order effects of how this is gonna upend society?"