I don’t know any of the science behind it, but my experience with these kinds of ideas (including the 2007 wiimote target demo which I replicated and showed to family), is that they feel exhausting to use beyond a 15 min novelty. My guess is that the brain detects that the motions and such are not quite right, and like a wrong eyeglass prescription, your brain and eyes work overtime trying to figure out compensation.
could a (much) bigger screen compensate for this?
Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
121–130 of 277 posts
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here's why minimalism has such staying power. Fundamentally, pleasing design is about repetition and consistency. Brian loves patterns, that's all there is to it. Good graphic appeal isn't a seasoning like salt which you can just sprinkle on by paying for a few better "designed" assets. Its possible to make really pleasing design out of parts that are individually seen as cheap and low quality. Its also possible to m…
> Fundamentally, pleasing design is about repetition and consistency. Fundamentally, what makes design pleasing is super hard to reason about. If it was mostly about repetition and consistency, any webpage that used bootstrap or no css at all would be pleasing. If pleasing minimalism was very easy to pull off, nobody would take note of Apple products.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
I had the same thing with compiz when it first came out. I loved it in all the videos; and the first day, but I quickly switched back to plain old desktops.
I actually did use Compiz+Beryll for a fairly long while. Admittedly, the bugs were annoying, but after switching off the most gimmicky bits or at least making them less pronounced (like Wobbly Windows, lol) I found it to be quite nice to use. It felt a bit like if you were using WindowBlinds but supercharged. I later switched to i3wm and threw away desktop effects though. I wouldn't mind them, but I don't miss them…
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#124I am imagining it, and it's worse than the current norm.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#125Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#126No.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#127Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#128> Imagine, for example, opening your favorite brand’s website and being presented with a miniature virtual storefront. You could look at their most popular products as if you were standing on a sidewalk peering into their shop. I am imagining it, and it's worse than the current norm.
Re: Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optical illusion?
#129[CAVE](https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_Automatic_Virtual_Environ...)