Live data from Hacker News

Tesla's next-gen electric motors will get rid of rare earth elements

insideevs.com

61–70 of 200 posts

Re: Tesla's next-gen electric motors will get rid of rare earth elements

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Chinese people are awesome but the Chinese state can go to hell. Chinese people support the CCP. Most Chinese citizens are pro-CCP. So if you have a negative view of the CCP, then you should have a negative view of Chinese too. But you're probably wondering why Chinese people support the CCP? It's because the CCP improved the lives of 1.4 billion people and is still improving their lives. GDP per capita went from $31…

> So if you have a negative view of the CCP, then you should have a negative view of Chinese too. I disagree with the (admittedly large) subset of Chinese people who support the CCP, but me having a negative view of them as people doesn't follow from that. > It's because the CCP improved the lives of 1.4 billion people and is still improving their lives. GDP per capita went from $317 in 1990 to $12,000+ in 2022. And…

>I disagree with the (admittedly large) subset of Chinese people who support the CCP, but me having a negative view of them as people doesn't follow from that.

That's funny. Chinese people support CCP. Chinese people want CCP to stay in power. CCP is made of Chinese people, and reflects quite a bit of Chinese culture. You want the CCP to go to hell. But you think Chinese people are awesome.

Are you just trying to be politically correct? It's ok to say you hate Chinese people and Chinese culture.

Re: Tesla's next-gen electric motors will get rid of rare earth elements

#62
post #34

There are lots of ways to make motors without rare earths... There aren't many ways to make permanent magnet motors without rare earths. The slide specifically claims this is the next generation permanent magnet motor. So the question is... Did they invent a new magnet Chemistry... Or are they using a known magnet Chemistry and are okay with not-very-strong magnets?

Best example I know of for new magnet chemistry without rare earths is Niron Magnetics: https://www.nironmagnetics.com/ https://hackaday.com/2022/09/01/iron-nitrides-powerful-magne... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34359383

> Our product roadmap climbs the ladder of performance allowing us to replace NdFeB magnets initially on the basis of price performance and ultimately on the basis of absolute performance

So it sounds like they haven't yet figured out how to make a magnet as strong as a regular NeFeB magnet, but it is theoretically possible to do so.

Magnet strength is one of the key inputs for motor torque per unit mass, and it seems unlikely Tesla would want to trade off much of either mass or torque for price.

Re: Tesla's next-gen electric motors will get rid of rare earth elements

#63
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find it hard to think that the US (With it's many, many fuck-ups) is the only, let alone the -worst- guilty party in the last 100 years. Slavery and native American genocides are pretty bad - as well as the countless countries US has invaded/bombed. But anyways, are we trying to estimate which country has done more bad in the last 300 years? China or US? And are you willing to become more pro-China if we conclude t…

The US also initiated many famines. For instance, there was one in 2020 that US policy contributed to.

The US is a net food exporter. What you are saying is propaganda, not fact. The US is the largest food-Aid donator. The US has shipped millions of pounds of food around the world to feed people… for free. We are talking billions a year in spending.

https://www.wfpusa.org/articles/1-millionth-ton-american-whe...

Re: Tesla's next-gen electric motors will get rid of rare earth elements

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So if you have a negative view of the CCP, then you should have a negative view of Chinese too. I disagree with the (admittedly large) subset of Chinese people who support the CCP, but me having a negative view of them as people doesn't follow from that. > It's because the CCP improved the lives of 1.4 billion people and is still improving their lives. GDP per capita went from $317 in 1990 to $12,000+ in 2022. And…

> I disagree with the (admittedly large) subset of Chinese people who support the CCP, but me having a negative view of them as people doesn't follow from that. That's funny. Chinese people support CCP. Chinese people want CCP to stay in power. CCP is made of Chinese people, and reflects quite a bit of Chinese culture. You want the CCP to go to hell. But you think Chinese people are awesome. Are you just trying to be…

Chinese people are brought up in an environment that tells them to support the CCP and where vocal dissent is punished. Their centrally controlled media ecosystem is rigged against them being able to think and speak clearly on this issue. They have been the primary victims of the CCP since its inception. Also, Chinese people aren't a monolith. If you sorted Chinese people by how jingoistic they are I would probably dislike the top 10-20% or so on that basis but that doesn't generalize to every Chinese person, even those that tow the socially expected line of "supporting" the CCP.

Re: Tesla's next-gen electric motors will get rid of rare earth elements

#65
post #48

Umm, Teslas do not use DC motors, I don't know where the article got that idea. I doubt they've ever used DC motors for anything more powerful than an electric seat adjuster. The Model 3 does use a permanent magnet motor, but it's an AC synchronous reluctance motor. If you're going to make an article about electric motors in Teslas, at least make sure you get the facts about the electric motors right.

If you're going to make authoritative comments about motors, you should actually get your facts correct first.

>The Model 3 does use a permanent magnet motor, but it's an AC synchronous reluctance motor.

No, synchronous reluctance motors do not use permanent magnets on their rotors. The motors that do are called "brushless DC motors". I'm not sure what the Model 3 uses, but last time I saw a cutaway, years ago, it was using an inductance motor, which is entirely different, but maybe they switched to BLDC for efficiency gains.

Re: Tesla's next-gen electric motors will get rid of rare earth elements

#66
post #48

Umm, Teslas do not use DC motors, I don't know where the article got that idea. I doubt they've ever used DC motors for anything more powerful than an electric seat adjuster. The Model 3 does use a permanent magnet motor, but it's an AC synchronous reluctance motor. If you're going to make an article about electric motors in Teslas, at least make sure you get the facts about the electric motors right.

If you're going to make authoritative comments about motors, you should actually get your facts correct first. >The Model 3 does use a permanent magnet motor, but it's an AC synchronous reluctance motor. No, synchronous reluctance motors do not use permanent magnets on their rotors. The motors that do are called "brushless DC motors". I'm not sure what the Model 3 uses, but last time I saw a cutaway, years ago, it wa…

What is the state-of-the-art for battery-electric ships?

the power is probably MVDC from the large battery. And these are large xxMW motors.

So will we end up usong inverters anyway?

Re: Tesla's next-gen electric motors will get rid of rare earth elements

#68

Why this is important: If successful, this contributes towards the reduction of national security risk around rare earth supplies and supply chain located in a possibly unfriendly nation state (major deposits are in Russia and China) and also means you don’t have to establish rare earth mines or supply chains in your own countries (capital and environmental concerns). It’s a big deal! Also, just as newer battery chem…

>just as newer battery chemistries moved away from cobalt Tesla seems to be the leader here. Per Investor Day[0] and other sources, they - developed low-cobalt and low-nickel cathodes, to reduce scarce battery metals - increased overall vehicle efficiency to allow iron cathodes which are earth-abundant - consolidated electronic modules to reduce microchips and wiring - are soon switching to 48V, to further reduce low…

[flagged]

Re: Tesla's next-gen electric motors will get rid of rare earth elements

#69
post #7

> Tesla plans New content for https://elonmusk.today

Ehh, Tesla just sold their 4 millionth vehicle (waited until then for investor day so they could flex), are breaking ground in Mexico shortly on their new factory, and are rapidly approaching $100B/year in revenue at a 25-30% margin (while other EV startups are teetering near death and legacies are slow to catch up). Constructive skepticism is fine, but strong evidence of their innovation capacity is available (espec…

Strong evidence of their innovation capacity will never overcome intense dislike of the brand. And will never translate into a sale (n=1).

Re: Tesla's next-gen electric motors will get rid of rare earth elements

#70

Why this is important: If successful, this contributes towards the reduction of national security risk around rare earth supplies and supply chain located in a possibly unfriendly nation state (major deposits are in Russia and China) and also means you don’t have to establish rare earth mines or supply chains in your own countries (capital and environmental concerns). It’s a big deal! Also, just as newer battery chem…

[flagged]

Maybe bc China steal other countries tech (countless examples). Or blackmail countries [1]. Or kidnaps people [2]. Or reeducate people because of their ethnicity and religion [3]. Or still declares herself as a WTO developing country while having a space station all alone. [4]

[1] https://it.euronews.com/my-europe/2021/05/07/il-montenegro-l... [2] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/18/china-forced-2... [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_internment_camps#%3A%... [4] https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis....

Post reply on HN