Bsdutils: Alternative to GNU coreutils using software from FreeBSD
1–10 of 85 posts
Re: Bsdutils: Alternative to GNU coreutils using software from FreeBSD
#2Re: Bsdutils: Alternative to GNU coreutils using software from FreeBSD
#3Re: Bsdutils: Alternative to GNU coreutils using software from FreeBSD
#4Why does it need gnu cc rather than llvm?
Re: Bsdutils: Alternative to GNU coreutils using software from FreeBSD
#5Why does it need gnu cc rather than llvm?
It needs a GNU _compatible_ C compiler. You can still use LLVM's Clang.
Your point about "compatible" is well made. I should have been clearer.
Wasn't gentoo born as Linux userspace on BSD kernel at one point?
Re: Bsdutils: Alternative to GNU coreutils using software from FreeBSD
#6There’s a Rust coreutils too.
MIT license
Re: Bsdutils: Alternative to GNU coreutils using software from FreeBSD
#7Re: Bsdutils: Alternative to GNU coreutils using software from FreeBSD
#8Doesn't GNU utils have more features?
Re: Bsdutils: Alternative to GNU coreutils using software from FreeBSD
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
It needs a GNU _compatible_ C compiler. You can still use LLVM's Clang.
I'm guessing that it invokes /usr/include which on Linux is probably not neutral to CPP or gnu-isms. Your point about "compatible" is well made. I should have been clearer. Wasn't gentoo born as Linux userspace on BSD kernel at one point?
Re: Bsdutils: Alternative to GNU coreutils using software from FreeBSD
#10What would be an advantage of switching from GNU coreutils to BSD coreutils? Doesn't GNU utils have more features?