This will save a lot of money over time. Last time I checked in any detail, electricity prices per mile of transport per ton were about 25% that of fossil fuel prices per mile of transport per ton, and that was three years ago. They should really move all long-haul trucking to electric as well, at least for the main trunk lines, and for city-wide delivery. Remote rural routes will likely be the hardest to electrify.
I have a hard time believing electric semis are cheaper because of range limits.
U.S. Postal Service starts nationwide electric vehicle fleet, buying 9,250 EVs
121–130 of 503 posts
Re: U.S. Postal Service starts nationwide electric vehicle fleet, buying 9,250 EVs
#122I’ve been wondering what the most repairable vehicle might look like, and I guess the USPS already put a lot of brain power into that problem. I presume this is ugly because it’s both purpose built and highly repairable.
Ugly is subjective. I see it as "modern style has been sacrificed to achieve functionality/safety/..." and that's a form of beautiful for me.
Re: U.S. Postal Service starts nationwide electric vehicle fleet, buying 9,250 EVs
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
Over-provisioning vehicles has a capital penalty and requires staging areas that don’t already exist.
All of this has a capital penalty and requires stuff that doesn't exist yet. We're discussing exactly what stuff might be worth said capital penalty. If the basic running costs of these are really 25% of ICE vehicles then there's a lot of wiggle room for some extra "capital penalty" while still saving a tonne of money.
Re: U.S. Postal Service starts nationwide electric vehicle fleet, buying 9,250 EVs
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
All of this has a capital penalty and requires stuff that doesn't exist yet. We're discussing exactly what stuff might be worth said capital penalty. If the basic running costs of these are really 25% of ICE vehicles then there's a lot of wiggle room for some extra "capital penalty" while still saving a tonne of money.
I’m not convinced EVs have a capital penalty over ICE. If an operator already has a truck they aren’t going to be in the market for a replacement, EV or not, until it reaches EOL. The lower cost of operation may move the needle on when ICE trucks reach EOL but not by much. How does an owner-operator justify the cost of buying two trucks and staging them? Even for larger operations how do they justify buying trucks th…
Re: U.S. Postal Service starts nationwide electric vehicle fleet, buying 9,250 EVs
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the problem with long haul trucking is just getting the range. Are we close to having enough battery capacity to allow drivers to meet their hours-per-day limits? If not electric won’t be economical for operators. Local delivery is a much clearer fit for electric, even in the short term. We see that here.
Stop-start traffic and local delivery is much clearer, but from what I've seen of the energy calculations on Tesla Semi, it actually makes sense for bulky vs. heavy shipments on flat, warm routes, as long as there is appropriately sited charging infrastructure. Especially good for consumer-facing and high margin fleets, which is why Frito-Lay is an ideal launch customer. Even if it doesn't make absolute sense today,…
Re: U.S. Postal Service starts nationwide electric vehicle fleet, buying 9,250 EVs
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wish I could buy one of those vans. They're almost exactly what I want to make a camper from.
EVs are still not campervan ready unless you have no plans to boondock (i.e you will always have a connection to the grid when you stop for the night). If you use solar for recharging, best efforts (with a huge unfolding PV array) get you maybe 100 mile hops. That might be enough for some folks, but it's probably not going to be generally satisfactory (and, btw, it is a huge PV array that is required).
Re: U.S. Postal Service starts nationwide electric vehicle fleet, buying 9,250 EVs
#127This will save a lot of money over time. Last time I checked in any detail, electricity prices per mile of transport per ton were about 25% that of fossil fuel prices per mile of transport per ton, and that was three years ago. They should really move all long-haul trucking to electric as well, at least for the main trunk lines, and for city-wide delivery. Remote rural routes will likely be the hardest to electrify.
I think the problem with long haul trucking is just getting the range. Are we close to having enough battery capacity to allow drivers to meet their hours-per-day limits? If not electric won’t be economical for operators. Local delivery is a much clearer fit for electric, even in the short term. We see that here.
https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/9/18538030/germany-ehighway-...
Re: U.S. Postal Service starts nationwide electric vehicle fleet, buying 9,250 EVs
#1289,250 EVs vs 14,000 charging stations. Why start off with 30% more more charging stations than EVs?
Re: U.S. Postal Service starts nationwide electric vehicle fleet, buying 9,250 EVs
#129There is so little need for a post office any more except as a junk mail delivery system. I'd rather see phase out plans.
Re: U.S. Postal Service starts nationwide electric vehicle fleet, buying 9,250 EVs
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a hard time believing electric semis are cheaper because of range limits.
The amount of energy needed to "fast charge" must be immense.