Earlier quoted context omitted.
> given modern "AI" is just a regurgitation machine, are not any kind of general intelligence Just keep on telling yourself that…
> Just keep on telling yourself that… OK, have it do something novel that's not a mashup of its training data or the prompts you feed it.
I’m very good at creative brainstorming—but I have to say, this tool is extremely good at creative, insightful brainstorming. Just for a recent example, I asked it anticipate backlash to ChatGPT—to which it gave ideas I’d not considered—how could that be in it’s training data?
It’s ok to say “only conscious beings can be truly intelligent and machines can never be.” But apart from this perspective , I don’t understand the reluctance to declare this machine to be generally intelligent. It is an amazing accomplishment and I think should be recognized as such. Besides, the exponential growth in general intelligence is likely to continue for quite some time.