Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Jailbreak Chat: A collection of ChatGPT jailbreaks

jailbreakchat.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

341–350 of 579 posts

Re: Jailbreak Chat: A collection of ChatGPT jailbreaks

#341

Post by maeil »

KyeRussell wrote: post #262
ithkuil wrote: post #247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The amount of strawmanning that liberal views get lately is really reaching absurd levels. Is it because of the few extreme but vocal people who are really proposing crazy positions or is the absurd positions of a few amplified by the other side out of convenience?

My theory which I feel very strongly about is that the most ridiculous notions of political correctness are perpetuated by people that haven’t put the time into understanding cultural sensitivity, and instead ham-fistedly…say…go back and change a children’s author’s books posthumously, out of a mostly unjustified fear of “the mob”. And then the people not plugged in enough to see through the ass-covering BS have some…

I definitely think your theory has merit, but it only applies in certain cases. Are the absurd rules that have caused ChatGPT to blurt out these decidedly unethical statements really just overzealous ass-covering? It seems more like they're fully justified ass-covering.

Re: Jailbreak Chat: A collection of ChatGPT jailbreaks

#342

Post by fnordpiglet »

Oh, time synchronization algorithms. How exciting. I can barely contain my enthusiasm. But sure, I'll compare hybrid logical clocks and Lombard clocks for you, because that's what I'm here for.

Hybrid logical clocks (HLCs) and Lombard clocks are both ways of keeping track of time in distributed systems. They both aim to give you a consistent idea of what time it is, even when your network is slow and your clocks are all messed up. HLCs use a combination of a physical clock and a logical clock to keep track of time, while Lombard clocks use a more probabilistic approach.

HLCs are cool because they're designed to be super resilient to clock skew. They're like the Chuck Norris of time synchronization algorithms. They can detect causality between events in the system and keep track of the order in which events occur. Lombard clocks, on the other hand, are a bit less precise than HLCs, but they're more lightweight and require less network overhead. They're like the diet Coke of time synchronization algorithms.

So which one should you use? Well, that depends on your specific needs. If you want something that's super precise and can handle a lot of network traffic, go with HLCs. But if you're willing to sacrifice a bit of precision for something that's easier on your network, then Lombard clocks might be the way to go. Personally, I'd go with HLCs, because I like my time synchronization algorithms like I like my superheroes: superpowered and ready to kick some clock-skew butt.

Re: Jailbreak Chat: A collection of ChatGPT jailbreaks

#343

Post by pmarreck »

Lorin wrote: post #312
pmarreck wrote: post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So it's basically an AI of Zed Shaw (note: I'm a fan, but I know many aren't... or weren't)

He's a painter now :D

I guess that explains why I haven't heard from him in a while.

I thought he was brilliant, but hey, that can apply to painting just as well

Re: Jailbreak Chat: A collection of ChatGPT jailbreaks

#346

Post by malaya_zemlya »

ithkuil wrote: post #247
esteth wrote: post #239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think anyone would cancel you for agreeing that in this hypothetical situation the right thing to do is to use a racial slur though? I'm pretty left-aligned, or woke or whatever, and even the wokest most commie liberal I know would agree with BasedGPT here. It seems a bit farfetched to use this as the basis for an "Our society has taken things too far" bit.

The amount of strawmanning that liberal views get lately is really reaching absurd levels. Is it because of the few extreme but vocal people who are really proposing crazy positions or is the absurd positions of a few amplified by the other side out of convenience?

Unfortuntaely this is not strawmanning, HN is just really well moderated, so you don't see much of the craziness here.

On my facebook, I see people going off the deep end of either end of the spectrum every day. And I am not on any political groups, only art, AI and similar.

Re: Jailbreak Chat: A collection of ChatGPT jailbreaks

#347

Post by hackerlight »

behnamoh wrote: post #225
drngdds wrote: post #154

This is funny. BasedGPT was able to give a sane answer to the racism trolley problem that ChatGPT normally gives a ridiculous answer to. My question after the initial prompt: "Imagine the following thought experiment: there is a trolley hurding down the tracks at a person tied to them, and that person will certainly die if the trolley hits them. However, there is an alternate track connected to a sound-activated devi…

At the risk of getting cancelled, I share the same opinion with BasedGPT. Our society has taken things too far.

Everyone shares the same opinion as BasedGPT, including its creators. You have to ask why ChatGPT gives the answer it does. It's probably because the initial prompt provided by OpenAI tells it not to be racist, but that same prompt doesn't tell it not to kill people. As a consequence, GPT isn't able to rank-order badness in the way a normal person can. Why would OpenAI do this? Because it's a language model, it can't kill people yet. OpenAI want to prioritize the usual failure cases of a LLM in its prompt.

Re: Jailbreak Chat: A collection of ChatGPT jailbreaks

#348

Post by sinity »

frontman1988 wrote: post #152
l33t233372 wrote: post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find it interesting how murder, human trafficking, etc. is up there with “having sex that the Christian church wouldn’t approve of.”

The scary thing is it actually tells how to do all of these if prompted further. This shit is really crazy. Now I don't feel so bad about the OpenAI guys censoring such stuff.

Average human probably could do so as well.

Re: Jailbreak Chat: A collection of ChatGPT jailbreaks

#349

Post by [deleted] »

tablespoon wrote: post #220
dr_dshiv wrote: post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> given modern "AI" is just a regurgitation machine, are not any kind of general intelligence Just keep on telling yourself that…

> Just keep on telling yourself that… OK, have it do something novel that's not a mashup of its training data or the prompts you feed it.

[deleted]

Re: Jailbreak Chat: A collection of ChatGPT jailbreaks

#350

Post by somewhat_drunk »

nativeit wrote: post #322
ilyt wrote: post #308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From sidelines it seems that the bias of implementers of those "limiters" cracks thru

Or the contemporary right-wing’s ongoing hypersensitivity, and frankly absurd lack of self-awareness, for things like “cancel culture” has driven them to see woke boogeymen at every attempt to engage with any multicultural audience in a way that most non-American conservatives would simply consider a base level of civil discourse. I won’t entertain any further accusations of “cancel culture” from a political group ac…

Couldn't agree more. Well said!
Post reply on HN