Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

9to5mac.com

41–50 of 168 posts

Re: Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the rest of the world moved on to other messaging services Speak for yourself. I'm not in the US and still prefer SMS, simply because you can port over your contacts and don't have to share them with shady businesses on a fscking platform, for freaking text messages, something we already did 30 years ago (not counting emails almost double as old).

So you'd rather pay extra to send completely unencrypted messages?

They're not completely unencrypted - they are encrypted with A5 between the handset and the tower.

They are certainly not e2ee.

Re: Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

#42
post #38
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a little odd that the US is so iMessage-heavy when the rest of the world isn't but IMO relying on another proprietary protocol (i.e. WhatsApp) really isn't great either. I kind of think everyone is in an awful place.

I don't have WhatsApp or iMessage; anyone who wants to communicate with me can use email or Signal. Signal lets me sign in with VoIP numbers, so it works fine for my uses, and is reasonably secure.

If I drew that line I would have approximately zero people communicating with me.

Re: Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

#43
post #8
post #4

Having switched back to Android, it can be infuriating dealing with iPhone users. I get slammed with "messages" when someone reacts to a message and oftentimes, messages just don't show up or messages go to my iPad and not my phone. Apple makes this extremely confusing. The iPhone users never know of their message goes through or what they're actually sending to (my iCloud account or my phone number).

Having lived all over the world, but not the US, I don't think I've sent or received an SMS/text message once in the last decade (except for bad 2FA implementations). Apple's weird and semi-transparent (to the user) hybrid system of mixing a proprietary web protocol and SMS in the same app is obviously problematic, and the rest of the world moved on to other messaging services, but it's weird that the US is still stu…

SMS is an old and dated protocol that we strangely use for security 2FA too. There needs to be an updated protocol, there is one in the works, but the carriers AT&T and it's spawn, are really trying to set it up so they can nickel and dime users.

Re: Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

#44
post #4

Having switched back to Android, it can be infuriating dealing with iPhone users. I get slammed with "messages" when someone reacts to a message and oftentimes, messages just don't show up or messages go to my iPad and not my phone. Apple makes this extremely confusing. The iPhone users never know of their message goes through or what they're actually sending to (my iCloud account or my phone number).

If you still have your iPhone, you can turn off iMessage so the system tells other users you’re no longer using it.

Re: Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

#45
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a little odd that the US is so iMessage-heavy when the rest of the world isn't but IMO relying on another proprietary protocol (i.e. WhatsApp) really isn't great either. I kind of think everyone is in an awful place.

I agree that proprietary protocols suck and users are harmed long term, iMessage due to reasons described is by far the worst : it doesn't even bother to tell senders reliably if recipients received it, not even going into read status. Due to Apple's desperate need to keep all their inventions to themselves only regardless of long term effects (lightning port say hi and bye in quick succession), its worse than useles…

> it doesn't even bother to tell senders reliably if recipients received it, not even going into read status

Huh? That's exactly what iMessage does, and one of the key reasons people prefer it over SMS.

Re: Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

#46
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you'd rather pay extra to send completely unencrypted messages?

They're not completely unencrypted - they are encrypted with A5 between the handset and the tower. They are certainly not e2ee.

They are completely unencrypted, just on the initial and the last "mile" the TRANSPORT layer is (sort of) encrypted.

Re: Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

#47
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having lived all over the world, but not the US, I don't think I've sent or received an SMS/text message once in the last decade (except for bad 2FA implementations). Apple's weird and semi-transparent (to the user) hybrid system of mixing a proprietary web protocol and SMS in the same app is obviously problematic, and the rest of the world moved on to other messaging services, but it's weird that the US is still stu…

SMS is an old and dated protocol that we strangely use for security 2FA too. There needs to be an updated protocol, there is one in the works, but the carriers AT&T and it's spawn, are really trying to set it up so they can nickel and dime users.

I'm starting to get SMS spam.. (my favorite from banks I don't have an account at..)

I hate being nickel and dimed, but if this is one case where if sending me a message cost a few cents, and it ends up stopping SMS spam, it might be worth it..

Back when I stated using a phone, we used to have to pay for texts...

Re: Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

#48
post #40

If someone at Apple is reading this, please, for the love of god, let me pay to have iMessage on my windows machine. I'd easily pay $100/year.

I can't see them loosening access to iMessage willingly. It's like the App Store: a moat to keep users confined to the Apple ecosystem. Allowing users choice and freedom is anathema to Apple's business model.

Re: Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a little odd that the US is so iMessage-heavy when the rest of the world isn't It's not odd at all. Lots of iPhones in the US because of high incomes, and high iPhone availability. Lots of non-iPhones in the rest of the world because of comparatively low incomes, and significantly less iPhone availability. I see no mystery.

I think the real reason is that in the early 2000s, pre-iPhone, texting was ridiculously expensive in the US and much cheaper in the rest of the world. Also, Americans were using awful phones while the RoW was using much better phones like Nokias thst even in their non-communicator series made texting far easier thanks to stuff like T9. So the rest of the world used SMS and texting far more than Americans Pre-smartph…

> Also, Americans were using awful phones while the RoW was using much better phones like Nokias thst even in their non-communicator series made texting far easier thanks to stuff like T9.

Worth mentioning the unique phones sold in the Japanese market by domestic manufacturers prior to smartphones, which were some of the most advanced in existence at that point and had been for many years. People in Japan were doing things on their phones in the late 90s and early 00s that most of the rest of the world wouldn’t for another 10-15 years.

Re: Microsoft somehow brings iMessage to Windows – will it last?

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is a little odd that the US is so iMessage-heavy when the rest of the world isn't It's not odd at all. Lots of iPhones in the US because of high incomes, and high iPhone availability. Lots of non-iPhones in the rest of the world because of comparatively low incomes, and significantly less iPhone availability. I see no mystery.

> Lots of iPhones in the US because of high incomes, and high iPhone availability The US is not the only country with a wealthy populace which tends to use mostly iPhones. The UK, Germany, Switzerland, the Baltics, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan are all roughly equally as wealthy (if not more so) per capita. However, in literally everywhere else but the US , people almost exclusively use third-party apps l…

> equally as wealthy (if not more so) per capita

Are you thinking of GDP, perhaps? I think that household income (and individual) is highest in the US (adjusted for PPP).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disposable_household_and_per_c...

Post reply on HN