Live data from Hacker News

Who rules Earth? Wild mammals far outweighed by humans and domestic animals

science.org

21–30 of 113 posts

Re: Who rules Earth? Wild mammals far outweighed by humans and domestic animals

#21
post #15

What I'd really like to know: the approximate total mass of all the COVID-19 viruses/virii that have infected humans since the start of the pandemic; the volume (in a vacuum perhaps) these virii would take up if dumped into a container and given a few shakes. Would they take up a thimble? shot glass? coffee mug? liter bottle? drinks cooler? bathtub? car cabin? back yard swimming pool? olympic pool? Larger? (ChatGPT w…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVgBjRFSMYs - All the World's Coronavirus fits in a Coke Can - Numberphile

I was able to pull this up quickly because I remembered they used a Coke can specifically, which helped zoom in quickly despite the noise in the search results.

Re: Who rules Earth? Wild mammals far outweighed by humans and domestic animals

#23
>“Shockingly tiny” fraction of our planet’s mammal mass is wild species

How is this shocking? It should be obvious. Who is shocked, the scientists or us uneducated peons?

It's bad enough when journalists inject marketing-level emotional words into news stories, now peer-reviewed academic journals have to stoop to this?

Re: Who rules Earth? Wild mammals far outweighed by humans and domestic animals

#24
post #15

What I'd really like to know: the approximate total mass of all the COVID-19 viruses/virii that have infected humans since the start of the pandemic; the volume (in a vacuum perhaps) these virii would take up if dumped into a container and given a few shakes. Would they take up a thimble? shot glass? coffee mug? liter bottle? drinks cooler? bathtub? car cabin? back yard swimming pool? olympic pool? Larger? (ChatGPT w…

Virus is uncountable in Latin, so you can pluralize it however you like. I prefer "viropodes".

Re: Who rules Earth? Wild mammals far outweighed by humans and domestic animals

#25
post #21
post #15

What I'd really like to know: the approximate total mass of all the COVID-19 viruses/virii that have infected humans since the start of the pandemic; the volume (in a vacuum perhaps) these virii would take up if dumped into a container and given a few shakes. Would they take up a thimble? shot glass? coffee mug? liter bottle? drinks cooler? bathtub? car cabin? back yard swimming pool? olympic pool? Larger? (ChatGPT w…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVgBjRFSMYs - All the World's Coronavirus fits in a Coke Can - Numberphile I was able to pull this up quickly because I remembered they used a Coke can specifically, which helped zoom in quickly despite the noise in the search results.

Awesome, thanks for the link!

Re: Who rules Earth? Wild mammals far outweighed by humans and domestic animals

#26
We live in an empty, denuded world, a faint shadow of its former self. Even "green" Ireland which sells itself as a natural place is an ecological wasteland.

From Whittled Away, by Padraic Fogarty

https://iwt.ie/product/whittled-away/

""" In 1623 it was reported chat Ireland was exporting 20,000 tons of pilchard annually.4 To pm this figure in perspective, it is over four times the toal landings for all species from the Irish Sea in 2014 and is exceeded today only by the individual open-water catches of mackerel. horse mackerel. and blue whiting Even if this figure is m exaggeration it gives some idea of the scale of shoals. However, It was not to last. The pilchard began its decline in the middle of the eighteenth century and by 1795 the Baltimore fishery was spoken of in the past tense. After thh, shoals of fish continued to appear, albeit intermittently. well into the nineteenth century. An appearance off Kilmore Quay in County Wexford in 1835 was the first in living memory and 'people did not know their value and there was no means of saving them and great quantities were used as manure'. In 1879 the Baltimore Company was wound up after a number of unsuccessful years and then fell into a terminal decline. The pilchards didn't disappear entirely but subsequent appearances resulted in catches being dumped or used to fertilise fields because demand was nor there to actually eat them. Today, there is no targeted fishery for pilchards and their occurrence in Irish waters is sporadic and of no commercial signifieance. """

Re: Who rules Earth? Wild mammals far outweighed by humans and domestic animals

#27
post #22

I’ve always been curious if earths total biomass is increasing and by how much.

It should, and quite significantly. Since WW2 ended thanks to Haber-Bosch process we burn hydrocarbons stored for millions of years to suck nitrogen from air and turn it into artifical fertilizers that then are used by our farmed plants and animals to make biomass that wouldn't be there otherwise.

> Nearly 50% of the nitrogen found in human tissues originated from the Haber–Bosch process.[59] Thus, the Haber process serves as the "detonator of the population explosion", enabling the global population to increase from 1.6 billion in 1900 to 7.7 billion by November 2018.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haber_process

Re: Who rules Earth? Wild mammals far outweighed by humans and domestic animals

#28
In the (excellent) What We Owe the Future, William MacAskill discusses some ways of considering and weighing values on different lives, one of which was counting neurons. I don't have the book in front of me, but from my notes at the time:

>There are 8 billion humans and 135 billion farmed animals, but in total humans have 700 million trillion neurons while farmed animals have in total only 20 million trillion. Still, there are maybe 600 trillion wild fish, which collectively have 12 billion trillion neurons. And that isn't even counting nematodes.

Re: Who rules Earth? Wild mammals far outweighed by humans and domestic animals

#30
post #22

I’ve always been curious if earths total biomass is increasing and by how much.

On what timescale? I think on the correct timescales biomass tracks what the environment supports. I'm not a geologist or biologist, but I have the impression that estimating biomass from fossil records is difficult. We do know that the oxygen boosts of the Proterozoic eon and Cambrian explosion caused an increase in biodiversity.

Given the lemma "life will thrive in a comfortable environment" it should thrive more when the environment is better.

Post reply on HN