Live data from Hacker News

Linux-factory: A framework used to create custom Linux Debian operating systems

github.com

61–70 of 88 posts

Re: Linux-factory: A framework used to create custom Linux Debian operating systems

#61

This project is a product of 4 years of work, mostly learning the Debian ecosystem. I started with Ubuntu, I’ve tried Arch, I’ve tried Gentoo, but nothing beats the ease of Debian when it comes to custom distributions. Debian was almost built to fork. Their ecosystem is amazing. Their live build tool is super. I built Linux Factory so everyone else can build custom Debian distributions easily without having to know t…

Why not just use mkosi? There are so many tools that do this already and mkosi is cross distro and can do super modern stuff like use UKIs.

Re: Linux-factory: A framework used to create custom Linux Debian operating systems

#62

This project is a product of 4 years of work, mostly learning the Debian ecosystem. I started with Ubuntu, I’ve tried Arch, I’ve tried Gentoo, but nothing beats the ease of Debian when it comes to custom distributions. Debian was almost built to fork. Their ecosystem is amazing. Their live build tool is super. I built Linux Factory so everyone else can build custom Debian distributions easily without having to know t…

Thanks for tool. Will there be GUIed version in future ? Like Suse had previously ?

> Like Suse had previously ?

Do you mean SUSE Studio? That functionality has been integrated into the openSUSE Build Service at https://build.opensuse.org/ .

Re: Linux-factory: A framework used to create custom Linux Debian operating systems

#64
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not arguing in good faith. Here's a simple example: you want hyprland, patheon and interception-caps2esc on ubuntu? Good luck! On arch, it's just a pacman away. You don't like how arch is perceived as elitist? Use manjaro. Ubuntu had its place in the last century, but with most development happening on git you need a rolling release.

It’s not funny if you have to explain it but it was mostly a joke, without rolling eyes. Also making fun a bit about how easy it is to make a claim that something is better than another thing and leave it at that, which is very common in every population but in particular something you hear from the arch one. I use Arch btw.

> It’s not funny if you have to explain it but it was mostly a joke, without rolling eyes.

Poe law strikes again! My apologies then, because I known how Arch can have this reputation.

But Arch is just so good! Ubuntu and RedHat seem to be stuck in the past: it's not just about rolling releases, but many small details that pile up.

FYI I also find Alpine very interesting.

Re: Linux-factory: A framework used to create custom Linux Debian operating systems

#66

This project is a product of 4 years of work, mostly learning the Debian ecosystem. I started with Ubuntu, I’ve tried Arch, I’ve tried Gentoo, but nothing beats the ease of Debian when it comes to custom distributions. Debian was almost built to fork. Their ecosystem is amazing. Their live build tool is super. I built Linux Factory so everyone else can build custom Debian distributions easily without having to know t…

Why not just use mkosi? There are so many tools that do this already and mkosi is cross distro and can do super modern stuff like use UKIs.

always when somebody says "why not use use X?" i always need to thing at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863

sometimes the answer is just, why not? - it's not forbidden to learn something or try a different approach.

Re: Linux-factory: A framework used to create custom Linux Debian operating systems

#67
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not just use mkosi? There are so many tools that do this already and mkosi is cross distro and can do super modern stuff like use UKIs.

always when somebody says "why not use use X?" i always need to thing at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863 sometimes the answer is just, why not? - it's not forbidden to learn something or try a different approach.

1. Having N tools that are 95% the same is just frustrating for everyone trying to find a tool that will be maintained.

2. Contributing to a project that almost does what you want leads to better tools that are also maintained so they can be relied upon to build new things.

3. Instead of building the Nth version of something, you could be working on something novel.

Theres no value from building something new if you can just learn how something that exists works and contribute to it instead. NIH syndrome is actively harmful to open source.

Re: Linux-factory: A framework used to create custom Linux Debian operating systems

#68
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not just use mkosi? There are so many tools that do this already and mkosi is cross distro and can do super modern stuff like use UKIs.

always when somebody says "why not use use X?" i always need to thing at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863 sometimes the answer is just, why not? - it's not forbidden to learn something or try a different approach.

I hate this reddit style comment of linking a barely related thread, not to make any sort of point, but to just try to show you are in the know of some in joke.

Re: Linux-factory: A framework used to create custom Linux Debian operating systems

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

these are for embedded boards though

Does that mean it can't be used for desktop PCs? I remember using it in the past but on a vm.

I won't use it myself, but it's linux, it's technically possible to use it in and out a vm anywhere

Re: Linux-factory: A framework used to create custom Linux Debian operating systems

#70
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s not funny if you have to explain it but it was mostly a joke, without rolling eyes. Also making fun a bit about how easy it is to make a claim that something is better than another thing and leave it at that, which is very common in every population but in particular something you hear from the arch one. I use Arch btw.

> It’s not funny if you have to explain it but it was mostly a joke, without rolling eyes. Poe law strikes again! My apologies then, because I known how Arch can have this reputation. But Arch is just so good! Ubuntu and RedHat seem to be stuck in the past: it's not just about rolling releases, but many small details that pile up. FYI I also find Alpine very interesting.

> Ubuntu and RedHat seem to be stuck in the past

Like offering users a GUI click-through installer?

Post reply on HN