41–50 of 81 posts
I like it. It's easy to be against change and difficult to get behind it. Maybe in attracting developers who criticize it, some will end up finding something educational. The homepage could be more useful, especially around the ways to contribute. But the main categories are right there in the first sentence of the first section, and the data structures makes sense. Good job!
[flagged]
maybe because w3 stands for "WORLD WIDE Web Consortium"? there is not only USA in this world, it is funny that you are interfering with the rest of the world for your own social and political problems.
[flagged]
Of course it was; how could there be any doubt? Surely the designer, or the artist, knows full well what she puts in the picture. The name of the game these days is diversity and inclusion. White males are so passé :-)
The responsiveness of this website is what I thought things were going to be like for all of the internet.
all it has is jquery3 + bootstrap4, still amazing.
I clicked hoping it was Warcraft 3 beta. Blizzard please give us Warcraft 4.
Back in the day there use to be a joke website called "every fucking bootstrap site" [1] where it would lambast the popular design zeitgeist of the time. I really wish websites would opt for more distinctive looks rather than the massive homogenization we see across the web. Everything looks the same when it doesn't have to. Things can be stylized while accounting for accessibility and usability. I don't know what to…
Bootstrap invited sites to use huge full-bleed stock photos, carousels, colorful buttons, large icons, slide out menus, etc when none of that fancy design language actually resonated with the function of the site.
The desire wasn't to mock boring sites into hiring rockstar designers to make their designs even more unique and fashionable. It was for boring sites to lay off on the cheap whoopy doo design (because design-forward content is tiring when too familiar) and just present themselves clearly and without all the shitty pizazz.
This site does have that problem, but its remedy is basically the opposite of what you seem to be suggesting.
It reminded me of how good is the performance and design of the UK design system https://design-system.service.gov.uk/
Hope that at some point they can hire an illustrator to make some custom illustrations with more personality.
What is used to build this site? some SSG, or SSR, or SPA, or a CMS like wordpress? check its html source showed jquery 3.5.1 and bootstrap 4. Also liked this newly updated page: https://www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/ and it's using jquery1.x still. now I start to wonder all those new SSG|SSR trend along with SPA, maybe bootstrap + jquery combination is good enough?