> we’re not addressing the real problem: the MPAA’s buying power in Congress. This is a campaign finance problem. This is delusional at best. I'm from France, where campaigns are paid for by public money. France: the country that brought you Hadopi and where SOPA-like laws have been in place for a long time. This has nothing to do with campaign finance.
What do you think is the source of the problem in France? Maybe the way money influences politics is more so a problem here. I do think it is a stretch to say it is completely irrelevant, because it seems clear that it isn't.
But my point is, if you remove this vehicle the problem doesn't go away, it just takes another form.
And in fact I think it's good that it takes the form of campaign finance, because at least it's visible: you can see who gives how much money to which man / party / cause.
And anyway, politicians don't care about "freedom"; they care about big companies, because they have dinner with CEOs; they care about "jobs" because they think that's what matters to their constituents. Solving campaign finance wouldn't change any of that.