Live data from Hacker News

Killing Hollywood Will Require Learning Hollywood’s Game

pandodaily.com

21–26 of 26 posts

Re: Killing Hollywood Will Require Learning Hollywood’s Game

#21
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Distribution is probably the easier part of the problem once you have a quality movie that was funded. Y Combinator could just partner with Youtube and release it worldwide. The hard part is funding the right movies and with as much as they need initially.

So let's bring it down: "We need high quality content". We need content good enough to replace Hollywood. It is the biggest Entertainment brand in the world, not an easy task.

Have you watched The Guild? Some of the best content I have seen in a long time. I think this is just getting started.

This reminds me of how people used to criticize digital cameras when they first came out. A decade later and film cameras are dead.

Re: Killing Hollywood Will Require Learning Hollywood’s Game

#22
post #16
post #5

Here is the recipe for killing Hollywood: 1. The Hollywood Business Model The Hollywood business model is based on 2 things: 1. Control of distribution 2. Financing of production The Internet has solved #1. Any content can be distributed to any one in the world for an effective cost of $0. The reason they are not dead yet is because no one has solved #2. They still control production of most content. 2. It's like Kic…

> You then distribute the film through the site, for a fee. Split the revenues 70 / 20 / 10. The film makers get 70%, the "producers" (the funders) get 20%, and the site gets 10%. This would be illegal unless everyone is a qualified investor. It's the reason Kickstarter requires you to "donate" money and you cannot return any kind of financial compensation.

Kick starter can't be used to start a corporation. That doesn't mean it couldn't be used to fund R&D. 20000 people can pay me $100 to make a movie, in exchange for a percentage of its sales. That's called a contract.

I can hire a production crew to make a movie.

No such activities constitute investment. They are just works for hire.

There may be liability issues. Potential breach of contract problems. You could get around that with the right contract structures (who hires whom, and what the terms are).

The funders wouldn't have the same rights as investors, but that seems ok.

Am I missing something?

Re: Killing Hollywood Will Require Learning Hollywood’s Game

#23
post #5

Here is the recipe for killing Hollywood: 1. The Hollywood Business Model The Hollywood business model is based on 2 things: 1. Control of distribution 2. Financing of production The Internet has solved #1. Any content can be distributed to any one in the world for an effective cost of $0. The reason they are not dead yet is because no one has solved #2. They still control production of most content. 2. It's like Kic…

>> The Internet has solved #1. Any content can be distributed to any one in the world for an effective cost of $0.

Very few people actually have the ability to distribute content on the web at an effective enough level to make money off of the content produced. Currently the majority of these people are people with huge YouTube channels.

It is very hard for anyone to distribute good content even if they have money. The problem of good content getting distribution is not solved.

Re: Killing Hollywood Will Require Learning Hollywood’s Game

#24

> But Hollywood shouldn’t care (if the MPAA had a clue) because it offers something YouTube can’t: An experience that you will get in a car, drive to, and pay $12 for. The article lost me right here. Every year this is less and less true for people in my generation. It doesn't take long for even the blockbusters to show up for rental. I'm not even sure what the article is trying to say. What is 'good'?

Given how inexpensive reasonably-good home theaters have become, how expensive theaters have become, and how one has no control over the theater experience (bad projection, too loud, talking, etc), this is only going to happen more. I think Hollywood is doomed, even with draconian laws on their side. Good content has been made online, and it's just getting started. I agree with the GP that simplifying and democratizi…

I'm totally in this camp - I prefer to watch something on my home theater system. More comfy seats, fills more of my field of vision, better schedule, better treats, watch in my jammies...

But my wife likes to go out to the movies. So we go out.

I expect that other forms of entertainment and other ways of producing content will coexist with the "legacy" model for some time.

Re: Killing Hollywood Will Require Learning Hollywood’s Game

#25
post #23
post #5

Here is the recipe for killing Hollywood: 1. The Hollywood Business Model The Hollywood business model is based on 2 things: 1. Control of distribution 2. Financing of production The Internet has solved #1. Any content can be distributed to any one in the world for an effective cost of $0. The reason they are not dead yet is because no one has solved #2. They still control production of most content. 2. It's like Kic…

>> The Internet has solved #1. Any content can be distributed to any one in the world for an effective cost of $0. Very few people actually have the ability to distribute content on the web at an effective enough level to make money off of the content produced. Currently the majority of these people are people with huge YouTube channels. It is very hard for anyone to distribute good content even if they have money. T…

Hollywood controls the distribution pipeline (Theater,TV,DVD,etc) and the timing of each (the release). Hollywood advertises each to build up demand. So you can also beat Hollywood by solving the "advertising to build up demand" over the internet part of the equation. Right now it's Facebook?
Post reply on HN