Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: the only evil to a capitalist is loss of capital. The "don't be evil" motto still applies. Just not the way that you're accustomed to reading it.
I'm surprised you're getting downvoted given the amount of snark in other comments. Or is the directness the part we're not supposed to be saying out loud?
Justice Department says Google destroyed evidence related to antitrust lawsuit
21–30 of 341 posts
Re: Justice Department says Google destroyed evidence related to antitrust lawsuit
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: the only evil to a capitalist is loss of capital. The "don't be evil" motto still applies. Just not the way that you're accustomed to reading it.
I'm surprised you're getting downvoted given the amount of snark in other comments. Or is the directness the part we're not supposed to be saying out loud?
Re: Justice Department says Google destroyed evidence related to antitrust lawsuit
#23https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18552824/512/1/united-s... > The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure required Google to suspend its auto-delete practices in mid-2019, when the company reasonably anticipated this litigation. Google did not. Instead, as described above, Google abdicated its burden to individual custodians to preserve potentially relevant chats. Few, if any, document custodians did so. That is, few cu…
Furthermore, even if you clear your Trash, it can take hours to take effect (for Some Reason), making it seem like you need to just give up and buy more storage.
Apparently Google execs don't have the same problems deleting their own files.
Re: Justice Department says Google destroyed evidence related to antitrust lawsuit
#24Re: Justice Department says Google destroyed evidence related to antitrust lawsuit
#25Re: Justice Department says Google destroyed evidence related to antitrust lawsuit
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm surprised you're getting downvoted given the amount of snark in other comments. Or is the directness the part we're not supposed to be saying out loud?
You can criticize a person, you can criticize a company, but criticizing capitalism itself is never popular here. I've been called a communist for literally quoting Adam Smith.
Re: Justice Department says Google destroyed evidence related to antitrust lawsuit
#27And they also teach employees how to Communicate with Care: always CC a lawyer and ask a question. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/03/google-routinely... The issue here is not so much that Google is playing these games but how this draws energy away from OTHER games-- i.e. shipping and keeping alive new products and offering real customer service for existing ones.
People would add lawyers like this, but (a) it wasn't something the trainings said to do, (b) the lawyers hated it, and (c) it doesn't work.
(I used to work at Google, speaking only for myself)
Re: Justice Department says Google destroyed evidence related to antitrust lawsuit
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm surprised you're getting downvoted given the amount of snark in other comments. Or is the directness the part we're not supposed to be saying out loud?
[flagged]
"Culture war" isn't just "disagreements", it's disagreements about things that only exist in the realm of culture, e.g. saggy pants or watching people of the same gender kiss on TV.
Economics, in fact, plays a central role here, given the profit motive that, to the bad actors, justifies these actions despite their illegality.
Re: Justice Department says Google destroyed evidence related to antitrust lawsuit
#29It was a cron job your honour
Re: Justice Department says Google destroyed evidence related to antitrust lawsuit
#30Why would good in mid 2019 know it had to save chat data for use in a lawsuit not filed for over another year? And why would such a lawsuit require saving all chats between everyone? Should google also have started video recording all in person meetings or stopped throwing out any trash in case there was something in those bins too?
If I'm reading this right- they allege that Google knew because they had already began withholding some materials and were issued 3 CIDs.