Live data from Hacker News

The FBI now recommends using an ad blocker when searching the web

standard.co.uk

41–50 of 445 posts

Re: The FBI now recommends using an ad blocker when searching the web

#41
post #32

Well too bad Google won't let you on the phone, Firefox at least allows you to install ublock.

Brave, Firefox, Bromite all do, or you can use nextdns or adguard as a private DNS in your network settings. I think the last option is a little wireguard set up to route traffic to a server or small pc that has unbound and pinhole on it

Re: The FBI now recommends using an ad blocker when searching the web

#42
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like, for those asking for cursory information about setting up an ad blocker, ublock origin should be recommended, and not pi-hole. Ublock Origin is a one click solution that works great for everyone, while pi-hole requires setup and does quite a lot. For instance, when I was using pi-hole, Windows Update and Epic Games Launcher simply stopped working for me. I'm not sure what was going on, it could have been…

I respect your feelings, but Ublock Origin is not available on my Android phone or on my iPad. It's also not available for all browsers. It may not work for you, but for me Pi-hole is a wonderful solution for my whole family, and they don't ever need me to touch their devices in order for it to work for them.

It's on Firefox

Re: The FBI now recommends using an ad blocker when searching the web

#43

FBI must have infiltrated ad blocker servers containing malicious url lists. Never using an adblocker again.

Using an adblocker based on Manifest v3 would avoid this, as those blockers can't phone home to update their malware datasets. ;)

Re: The FBI now recommends using an ad blocker when searching the web

#44
I think browser Notifications help drive these attacks. How many web sites do you visit that offer a pop-up that says the site would like to send you Notifications? You click Allow and suddenly start seeing Ads popup in your Notification area, not a site notification but an Ad.

I had a user show me one of these Notification ads just this week, telling here that McAfee found a virus and click the Ad to remove the virus. We do not even use McAfee, it was a straight up attack ad. Thanks Chrome!

Re: The FBI now recommends using an ad blocker when searching the web

#45
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like, for those asking for cursory information about setting up an ad blocker, ublock origin should be recommended, and not pi-hole. Ublock Origin is a one click solution that works great for everyone, while pi-hole requires setup and does quite a lot. For instance, when I was using pi-hole, Windows Update and Epic Games Launcher simply stopped working for me. I'm not sure what was going on, it could have been…

I respect your feelings, but Ublock Origin is not available on my Android phone or on my iPad. It's also not available for all browsers. It may not work for you, but for me Pi-hole is a wonderful solution for my whole family, and they don't ever need me to touch their devices in order for it to work for them.

it works on android (as long as you use firefox)

Re: The FBI now recommends using an ad blocker when searching the web

#46

Does anyone have any adblockers they recommend that still show "safe" ads (e.g. non-malware) by default, without having to whitelist every site? I'd be open to the security benefits of an adblocker if I could still passively support all the sites I visit. Edit: changed "good" to "safe" for clarity

The problem is you can't tell the difference.

Re: The FBI now recommends using an ad blocker when searching the web

#47
Is it time for an open source adblocker that only blocks bad actors?

I am perfectly fine with ads, I've previously run sites where it was a small source of income myself. I know it would be in a cat and mouse game with the bad guys but if it blocked most of them it would certainly help a lot of people.

Post reply on HN