I do wonder if there’s room in this analysis for specific social media analysis. It seems like it would be very hard to separate out effects of Facebook vs. effects of Twitter and so on, but at the same time I worry about throwing the baby out with the bath water.
A technology-intermediated social life is not inherently bad. Pen and paper letters are technology. Dumb phones are technology. We have been adapting culturally to new ways to communicate with each other for a long time; I want more about what’s driving this trend now, and I think it might be more than just feedback and cycle speed.
Or maybe it is simply the democratization of platforms; it’s bad when speech is filtered through a few trusted authorities but that doesn’t mean the opposite doesn’t have risks. (Yay, it’s the free speech debate!)