Something is wrong in the state of QED
1–10 of 19 posts
Re: Something is wrong in the state of QED
#2[deleted]
Re: Something is wrong in the state of QED
#3[flagged]
Re: Something is wrong in the state of QED
#4[deleted]
Re: Something is wrong in the state of QED
#5There was discussion of this a while back on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BrilliantLightPower/comments/ffnnxw...
Sounds like the arxiv author may be greatly exaggerating or misunderstanding, but I'm not up to speed enough on the math to say for myself
Re: Something is wrong in the state of QED
#6This has already been posted a few times: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31431033
The summary is that the author doesn't know what he's talking about.
Re: Something is wrong in the state of QED
#7I wouldn't put too much stock into this, the author is some random post-doc with a YouTube channel and the barrier to entry for arXiv is not very high. QED not not nearly as suspect as the author portrays and this should be considered against the entire field of Physics which is built on QED.
Re: Something is wrong in the state of QED
#8[flagged]
Why do you have such an emotional attachment to the truthiness of a scientific theory?
Re: Something is wrong in the state of QED
#9[flagged]
The guy who first described the wave-corpuscle duality, of course
Re: Something is wrong in the state of QED
#10Doesn't pass the sniff test.