Meta just gave thousands of employees poor performance reviews
1–10 of 72 posts
Re: Meta just gave thousands of employees poor performance reviews
#2Re: Meta just gave thousands of employees poor performance reviews
#3Re: Meta just gave thousands of employees poor performance reviews
#4> deploying AI tools to help our engineers be more productive
Interested in how that turns out. I seriously doubt that it will make the work environment any more pleasant.
That said, the salaries at Meta are pretty crazy. I guess folks are willing to put up with a lot to make that kind of dosh.
Of course, if, as has been speculated, this is a full-court press by all the top tech companies to push down salaries, then even the thought of "sticking with it for the great money" might not matter, anymore.
Soooo glad to be out of the rodent rally.
Re: Meta just gave thousands of employees poor performance reviews
#5https://archive.is/dOrAf
Thanks for the archive link.
It is strange when a single-paragraph article is behind a paywall like this. Shallow reporting is a wholly uninspiring incentive to provide any support whatsoever to a publication.
Re: Meta just gave thousands of employees poor performance reviews
#6> deploying AI tools to help our engineers be more productive Interested in how that turns out. I seriously doubt that it will make the work environment any more pleasant. That said, the salaries at Meta are pretty crazy. I guess folks are willing to put up with a lot to make that kind of dosh. Of course, if, as has been speculated, this is a full-court press by all the top tech companies to push down salaries, then…
If you'd earn less going somewhere else, then there's no reason to jump ship till you have to: keep banking the money till the situation becomes untenable.
Re: Meta just gave thousands of employees poor performance reviews
#7This is great news, it helps establish performance reviews are a legitimate business tool and are not abused to achieve predetermined results. I’m sure that when managers have to make tough future decisions without enough evidence, I’ll be able to trust their judgment as much then as I can now.
Odd though how burnout is skyrocketing. Weird coincidence, I’m sure.
Re: Meta just gave thousands of employees poor performance reviews
#8> Managers gave about 10% of the company’s workers poor reviews
The article didn't manage to get a quote on what the guidance/orders for the reviews was.
For example, were managers given a target on how many of their reports were to receive poor reviews?
Or did the evaluation criteria change besides the target distribution?
Re: Meta just gave thousands of employees poor performance reviews
#9Nowhere is it mentioned that that this is an atypically high number. This could be the normal amount of low performers.
Re: Meta just gave thousands of employees poor performance reviews
#10> Managers gave about 10% of the company’s workers poor reviews The article didn't manage to get a quote on what the guidance/orders for the reviews was. For example, were managers given a target on how many of their reports were to receive poor reviews? Or did the evaluation criteria change besides the target distribution?
I'm confused, is 10% basically the stack ranking that we see at Microsoft/Amazon anyway? Did Facebook not have a "poor performer" bin when evaluating an organization before?