Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

The Average American Man Is Too Fat for Universal’s New Mario Kart Ride

thedrive.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–57 of 57 posts

Re: The Average American Man Is Too Fat for Universal’s New Mario Kart Ride

#51

Post by benatkin »

Semaphor wrote: post #50
benatkin wrote: post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Expecting a gaussian distribution everywhere. For instance in dead pixels in monitors. Say that most have no dead pixels but there are 1000 with one dead pixel. Should there be 1000 with an extra pixel?

I don’t understand what you are saying. The article says 50% of men. I said with the average, there is no need for it to be 50%, with the median there would be. I have no idea how what you say is related to that.

> The average gets pulled out of proportion by outliers

This places a value judgment on the mean not being close to the median

Re: The Average American Man Is Too Fat for Universal’s New Mario Kart Ride

#52

Post by Semaphor »

benatkin wrote: post #51
Semaphor wrote: post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t understand what you are saying. The article says 50% of men. I said with the average, there is no need for it to be 50%, with the median there would be. I have no idea how what you say is related to that.

> The average gets pulled out of proportion by outliers This places a value judgment on the mean not being close to the median

No, it simply says there’s a chance. That is what this whole subthread was about, and you argued against it for some inexplicable reason. But now I see you even edited your original comment to say you misunderstood, so I’m thinking you are just arguing for the sake of it.

Re: The Average American Man Is Too Fat for Universal’s New Mario Kart Ride

#53

Post by thiht »

throwaway128128 wrote: post #44
elromulous wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But also BMI is a crap metric, since it doesn't account for percent fat / muscle.

Lol, your average American is 200 pounds of muscle. Right

That sounds like a South Park joke, « I ain’t fat, I’m athletic »

Re: The Average American Man Is Too Fat for Universal’s New Mario Kart Ride

#54

Post by TheFattestNinja »

oatmeal_croc wrote: post #15

"The average American man's waist is 40.5 inches, which means most American men would be excluded from the ride. The average American woman's waist is 38.7 inches." I am in disbelief, I'm pretty obese but looks like I'm under the mean.

To me is the opposite: like i know im obese and working on it, but my waist at the belly button is about 120cm and I have never found a seat I dont fit in. And I fly Ryanair all the time.

Re: The Average American Man Is Too Fat for Universal’s New Mario Kart Ride

#55

Post by trilbyglens »

nostrademons wrote: post #34
hn_throwaway_99 wrote: post #4

Wow, the linked CDC page in the article says the average American male over age 20 is 5'9" and 200 lbs. That gives a BMI of 29.5, while obesity is defined as >30. Pretty amazing.

Not all that surprising. Take a look at obesity rates over time: https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/vucjky/oc_...

Not at all surprising if you spend any time outside of your house in America.

Re: The Average American Man Is Too Fat for Universal’s New Mario Kart Ride

#56

Post by Fatnino »

trilbyglens wrote: post #55
nostrademons wrote: post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not all that surprising. Take a look at obesity rates over time: https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/vucjky/oc_...

Not at all surprising if you spend any time outside of your house in America.

The data implies most people don't spend much time outside.

Re: The Average American Man Is Too Fat for Universal’s New Mario Kart Ride

#57

Post by hn_throwaway_99 »

Ancalagon wrote: post #42
hn_throwaway_99 wrote: post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry, I think pretty much all those reasons are bogus. Yes, 100% agree that, as I said, it isn't a good metric for individuals, and I also agree that the actual calculation is weird - at the end of the day it's still just a ratio of height to weight. But all of this nonsense nitpicking about bone density vs muscle vs fat is irrelevant when using it to look at large population cohorts over time. Looking at weight vs…

Any studies in particular of interest on the strength metrics over time?

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/06/13/4815909...

There are links to the source study in that article.

Post reply on HN