Bird leaves S.F., blaming ‘the most onerous regulations’ in the world
1–10 of 83 posts
Re: Bird leaves S.F., blaming ‘the most onerous regulations’ in the world
#2Re: Bird leaves S.F., blaming ‘the most onerous regulations’ in the world
#3Re: Bird leaves S.F., blaming ‘the most onerous regulations’ in the world
#4Re: Bird leaves S.F., blaming ‘the most onerous regulations’ in the world
#5I wonder how much of that is a change in regulations, and how much is the end of early price competition that was never sustainable.
Re: Bird leaves S.F., blaming ‘the most onerous regulations’ in the world
#6I've noticed a significant drop in the availability of scooters where I live (a major European city) over the past year or so, including Bird exiting the market. Prices have increased substantially, and high-use subscription plans have disappeared. I wonder how much of that is a change in regulations, and how much is the end of early price competition that was never sustainable.
Re: Bird leaves S.F., blaming ‘the most onerous regulations’ in the world
#7For me this reads like sensible government policy at work. If the fines of cleanup eat into profits and are not just a minuscule cost of doing business, they set it just right instead of plain forbid it outright.
Re: Bird leaves S.F., blaming ‘the most onerous regulations’ in the world
#8I always thought S.F. would have made a great "city of the future" and ban cars and go full in on birds. Like https://culdesac.com/ (wow, when you look at the pictures from culdesac it looks like Sesame Street!)
If it doesn’t have schools, sports, and recreation for kids, it’s a dystopia.
Re: Bird leaves S.F., blaming ‘the most onerous regulations’ in the world
#9I always thought S.F. would have made a great "city of the future" and ban cars and go full in on birds. Like https://culdesac.com/ (wow, when you look at the pictures from culdesac it looks like Sesame Street!)