Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey
131–140 of 301 posts
Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just make sure you read every script and don't auto update. Back in the day, some changed to take over your facebook.
I would never use somebody else's userscript - that just seems like asking for trouble
Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey
#133Userscripts are such an amazing thing
Just make sure you read every script and don't auto update. Back in the day, some changed to take over your facebook.
Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey
#134Iceraven has had this capability forever, no big announcement required. If you want to use Firefox on android and don't want to deal with these artificial restrictions and excuses for bad behavior just get iceraven and call it a day.
And an additional shout out for FF Updater, which can keep Iceraven up to date - https://github.com/Tobi823/ffupdater
Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Only if you register with AMO.
It seems like Iceraven doesn't have this restriction, and works like Firefox on Android originally used to?
(It also supports custom lists like Fennec and FF Nightly.)
Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference is Chrome atleast gives you the choice (maybe illusion?) to opt-out of *some of the telemetry. Mozilla to-date refuses to build a one button switch to disable all telemetry [0] and there's calls to telemetry domains such as location.services.mozilla.com you cannot stop on some of their products like Firefox Focus (ironic for a privacy product). [0] https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/domains-allow-fir…
so you are willing to accept chrome on android that does not have any extensions so you cant have UBO and you have ads and scripts and all the BS of unprotected interent but you fear firefox telemetry. nice
I like uBO but you can replace it with a dns filtering service for 95% of its use case (ad blocking).
It could just be me but I do not see browser extensions on mobile as a killer feature. Moreso, when the same extensions are primarily developed for desktop.
Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey
#137I don't understand why Mozilla artificially limits what addons can be used on android. I've been using Tampermonkey on android for years, and it worked fine, just like other addons that don't happen to have yet been blessed so that users are granted the privilege of being able to choose to install them. For reference, to work around mozilla's artificial restrictions, you have to use nightly. Once you activate the deb…
Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
And also, why do they block loading XPI extensions on mobile :(
And also also, why they block the ability to run devtools directly on mobile. It's an incredibly sad state of affairs that I have to use a chromium fork to do something that was pioneered on Firefox. Why do Mozilla keep shooting themselves in the foot like this?
Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey
#139Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey
#140I don't understand why Mozilla artificially limits what addons can be used on android. I've been using Tampermonkey on android for years, and it worked fine, just like other addons that don't happen to have yet been blessed so that users are granted the privilege of being able to choose to install them. For reference, to work around mozilla's artificial restrictions, you have to use nightly. Once you activate the deb…
It would be good if they explained this in their documentation. But I think you summed it up in your own message: > […] you can either have a browser that doesn't catastrophically break every few updates; or you can have the freedom to install whatever addons you like […] I think they don't want malicious and abandoned extensions to taint the Firefox experience. Users will only see "Firefox is broken" and not realize…
In the days of XUL extensions, it was for users who installed a lot of extensions, but that hasn't been a problem for s long time.