Live data from Hacker News

Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

support.mozilla.org

91–100 of 301 posts

Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

#91
post #64

I use Fennec, and it allows adding any Desktop extension (idontcareaboutcookies, privacyredirect etc.).

Only if you register with AMO.

Yes, you are correct (forgot about that!). I had to create my own collection of accepted extensions [1] and reference this in Fennec.

[1]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/collections/1693474...

Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

#92

If anyone needs a "monkey" not for web pages but for any process on your computer system, may I recommend Frida: https://frida.re https://github.com/frida/frida With Frida, you write JavaScript programs and then inject them into arbitrary processes, to hook and modify and call whatever you please. It gets a lot of use in the reverse engineering and vulnerability research communities, but has broader scope too. For in…

is this a fancy pants cheat engine?

Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What exactly is better in ViolentMonkey? Just want to know because I keep working with userscripts and after GreaseMonkey's collapse TamperMonkey has been my default userscript manager.

ViolentMonkey at least seemed to be the only one that worked in my Firefox with NoScript enabled on a site. And since I was occasionally writing script snippets to fix stupid uses of JS to unhide images/html, that was nice.

My browsing's habit is the same as yours, just a bit different is I use noscript-mode and write my own scripts to fix the sites using ublock alone (so I won't need 2 extensions for it).

It was a bit (nice) surprised for me to see many sites is really usable in noscript-mode.

Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

#94
post #5

Greasemonkey was the good one and then something happened with it and it was no longer the best choice. I'm not sure what. The same repeated with Tampermonkey. It now has telemetry built into it, at one time w/ no privacy policy. https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/6hs59w/tampermonke... The good one now is Violentmonkey. Has been for some time. Does Mozilla have an allowlist for these? If so I don't like it.

What exactly is better in ViolentMonkey? Just want to know because I keep working with userscripts and after GreaseMonkey's collapse TamperMonkey has been my default userscript manager.

no popup every few days asking for money

Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

#95

Iceraven has had this capability forever, no big announcement required. If you want to use Firefox on android and don't want to deal with these artificial restrictions and excuses for bad behavior just get iceraven and call it a day.

What's the difference between Iceraven and Fennec?

https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser

"Note that Iceraven Browser includes some unstable code written by Mozilla, with our own added modifications on top, all shipped with the stable version of GeckoView engine."

I wouldn't use iceraven if security was a priority.

Fennec on the other hand is much closer to FF , quoting their page :

https://f-droid.org/packages/org.mozilla.fennec_fdroid/

"Fennec F-Droid is based on the latest Firefox release (codenamed Fenix).

It has proprietary bits and telemetry removed, but still connects to

various Mozilla and Google services that can track users."

Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

#96
post #83

More importantly for me at least, ClearURLs. Now I can share nice stripped down Amazon links. Never used Tampermonkey before.

Another way to do this is to add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DandelionSprout/adfilt/mas... to uBlockOrigin as a custom filter list.

Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

#97
post #82
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A big thing for me is that Tampermonkey is not open source. And yes, Firefox on Android has an allowlist of "known working good" extensions, the reason given being that Firefox for Android doesn't implement everything the Desktop version implements and IIUC, want to a avoid users blaming the browser when something breaks because of it.

It really is bizzare, old Firefox used to support all addons, then they shipped a new version and only allowed like 10 addons, and to this day they don't allow any more. It's already been years. I know my addon works fine on mobile, but they provide no means of specifying that*. I tried to email them for it to become "recommended" but never heard back. The fact that they allow tampermonkey which allows any kind of sc…

I remember that update, suddenly they disabled Cookie AutoDelete, what left me with a bad feeling.

PS: Meanwhile I do not understand why is Ghostery included in that tinny allowed addons list (and now Tampermonkey).

Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

#98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

better sandbox, "feels" faster, zero Mozilla telemetry ;)

you're just replacing Mozilla telemetry with Google telemetry.

The difference is Chrome atleast gives you the choice (maybe illusion?) to opt-out of *some of the telemetry.

Mozilla to-date refuses to build a one button switch to disable all telemetry [0] and there's calls to telemetry domains such as location.services.mozilla.com you cannot stop on some of their products like Firefox Focus (ironic for a privacy product).

[0] https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/domains-allow-firefox

Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah yes, an addon whitelist. How very community friendly of Mozilla... And they wonder why their market share plummets the way it does, making such extremely user hostile decisions like that.

Playing devil's advocate here, don't they need to protect their users from nefarious add ons that could steal data?

[deleted]

Re: Firefox Android now supports Tampermonkey

#100
post #83

More importantly for me at least, ClearURLs. Now I can share nice stripped down Amazon links. Never used Tampermonkey before.

Another way to do this is to add https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DandelionSprout/adfilt/mas... to uBlockOrigin as a custom filter list.

"this list can not bypass tracker redirects through third-party domains. This can be done by strict-blocking said domain and using the ability to view parameters on the strict-block page or tools to bypass it"

I don't understand. Is there a video showing how to do this?

Post reply on HN