21–30 of 170 posts
is this the right place to shill a similar thing? (I use preact without bundlers for a while; also fast enough typescript without bundlers) UPD: - Preact template: https://github.com/wizzard0/naked-preact - node/browser TypeScript loader: https://github.com/wizzard0/t348-loader
is this the right place to shill a similar thing? (I use preact without bundlers for a while; also fast enough typescript without bundlers) UPD: - Preact template: https://github.com/wizzard0/naked-preact - node/browser TypeScript loader: https://github.com/wizzard0/t348-loader
Thanks for sharing! :D
UPD you recognize a software developer a mile away by his awesome estimation skills >_> published the typescript loader too!
It warms my heart to see frontend web dev maturing like this, it really does. Kudos to the author for putting this out there, that shell script is nifty. One trick I've used is to `npm install` my dependencies as normal but bundle them with esbuild, while also generating a typescript definition file. This gives me one file I can import in vanilla JS but also lets me check my JS with typescript.
So when I got back I couldn't believe how bad the experience became versus SSR frameworks, and gladly focused on backend and devops stuff instead.
It is refreshing to see this starting to happen.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not yet available on Safari, but still cool! https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/sc...
https://github.com/guybedford/es-module-shims has a polyfill. (But it is fairly large: 53KB raw, 15KB gzipped, 32KB minified, 11KB minified+gzipped. It’s providing a lot of likely-unnecessary functionality. I’d prefer a stripped-down and reworked polyfill that can also be lazily-loaded, controlled by a snippet of at most a few hundred bytes that you can drop into the document, only loading the polyfill in the uncommo…
It's a bit late to figure out, but I see caveats with dynamic imports in es-module-shims but not SystemJS.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not yet available on Safari, but still cool! https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/sc...
That's going to change when Safari 16.4 comes out - currently in beta: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-not...
FROM node:19.1.0
WORKDIR /project/vite_project
RUN npm init -y
RUN npm install react react-dom
RUN npm install -g esbuild
RUN npm install vite
EXPOSE 8081
CMD ["npm","run","dev"]
#!/usr/bin/env bash
docker build -t vite_play -f Dockerfile.vite emp/
is this the right place to shill a similar thing? (I use preact without bundlers for a while; also fast enough typescript without bundlers) UPD: - Preact template: https://github.com/wizzard0/naked-preact - node/browser TypeScript loader: https://github.com/wizzard0/t348-loader
Thanks for sharing! :D
I think Vue.js is an excellent choice for this. They recommend bundlers and the default import doesn't come with the template compiler but the template compiler is fast enough to run when loading the page, and the vue template syntax looks clean inside a template string IMO, especially if you take care to minimize logic in templates.