All those extraneous elements to Javascript are a real turn-off. Python: batteries mostly included. Javascript: feels like you need to drag a dozen suitcases along anytime you embark on any non-trivial project.
Writing JavaScript without a build system
91–100 of 187 posts
Re: Writing JavaScript without a build system
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
You’re missing the entire point. That’s still a build process and still has additional overhead for both development and deployment.
Have you used Vite before? If you have a simple project it's surprisingly fast and painless. What's the "additional overhead" you're talking about? I experienced that with Webpack, but not Vite. The author even shouts out esbuild as being "a little more stable", which Vite uses under the hood.
Re: Writing JavaScript without a build system
#93A lightning rod of an idea I’m sure, but would it help if typescript was accepted by browsers but ignored? Then I can write my typings in-line rather than in comments, and check them, but not have to transpile. I guess “enum” as a special snowflake would fail this. Where I’m coming from is that I can live without most build steps for a small project… but I can’t live without typescript.
Re: Writing JavaScript without a build system
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been looking for a modern JS library that doesn't require a build step, and I've always skipped over Lit because I thought it depended on a build until this comment. Is there any documentation about using it without a build? All the documentation and tutorials seem to assume a build step. I've found several different "getting started" entrypoints on the site, and they all begin with "npm install" and "import {Li…
Some of this depends on what you consider a build step. I generally don't consider installing from npm a build step. I also don't really consider rewriting import specifiers a build step - it's just locating files on disk. Regardless, we do have some workflows for completely "tool-less" (or local-tool-less). - We publish bundles to jsDelivr: https://lit.dev/docs/getting-started/#use-bundles - You can import directly…
>I generally don't consider installing from npm a build step. I also don't really consider rewriting import specifiers a build step - it's just locating files on disk.
Sorry, maybe this is just my JS ignorance, but I don't understand how this runs without a build step.
If I run npm -i lit, it puts lit into node_modules. But then if I put "import {LitElement, html} from 'lit';" into a JS file and run a dumb static webserver (like python3 -m http.server), what's linking "from 'lit'" to the necessary files in node_modules?
I just tried running the first tutorial[0] verbatim after npm installing lit to the same directory, and I get:
Uncaught TypeError: The specifier “lit” was a bare specifier, but was not remapped to anything. Relative module specifiers must start with “./”, “../” or “/”. my-element.js:1:31
I'd love to use this, I'm just not following how this works.Is it designed to run server-side rather than for static sites?
Re: Writing JavaScript without a build system
#95import Pkg from 'https://site.com/pkg.js'
import sheet from 'https://site.com/sheet.css' assert { type: 'css' };
Re: Writing JavaScript without a build system
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The appeal of JavaScript when it was invented was its immediacy. You can still do that. Nothing has changed. It's probably gotten even easier. Have fun implementing a complex UI without some sort of component Framework though.
You can easily build complex UIs without a framework. Chrome DevTools, Chrome OS, Photoshop, Firefox and other very complex apps have been built with web components.
Re: Writing JavaScript without a build system
#97I don't need to write JS much, but when I do, it's with a browser open in one window and a text editor in another.
Re: Writing JavaScript without a build system
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some of this depends on what you consider a build step. I generally don't consider installing from npm a build step. I also don't really consider rewriting import specifiers a build step - it's just locating files on disk. Regardless, we do have some workflows for completely "tool-less" (or local-tool-less). - We publish bundles to jsDelivr: https://lit.dev/docs/getting-started/#use-bundles - You can import directly…
Ah, gotcha. Thanks! > I generally don't consider installing from npm a build step. I also don't really consider rewriting import specifiers a build step - it's just locating files on disk. Sorry, maybe this is just my JS ignorance, but I don't understand how this runs without a build step. If I run npm -i lit, it puts lit into node_modules. But then if I put "import {LitElement, html} from 'lit';" into a JS file and…
More info: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/sc...
Re: Writing JavaScript without a build system
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah, gotcha. Thanks! > I generally don't consider installing from npm a build step. I also don't really consider rewriting import specifiers a build step - it's just locating files on disk. Sorry, maybe this is just my JS ignorance, but I don't understand how this runs without a build step. If I run npm -i lit, it puts lit into node_modules. But then if I put "import {LitElement, html} from 'lit';" into a JS file and…
Looks like you need a -- it could map 'lit' to the CDN hosted version or to a relative path. More info: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/sc...
It seems like a handy way to make my code match the code in documentation that assumes a Node environment.
Re: Writing JavaScript without a build system
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some of this depends on what you consider a build step. I generally don't consider installing from npm a build step. I also don't really consider rewriting import specifiers a build step - it's just locating files on disk. Regardless, we do have some workflows for completely "tool-less" (or local-tool-less). - We publish bundles to jsDelivr: https://lit.dev/docs/getting-started/#use-bundles - You can import directly…
Ah, gotcha. Thanks! > I generally don't consider installing from npm a build step. I also don't really consider rewriting import specifiers a build step - it's just locating files on disk. Sorry, maybe this is just my JS ignorance, but I don't understand how this runs without a build step. If I run npm -i lit, it puts lit into node_modules. But then if I put "import {LitElement, html} from 'lit';" into a JS file and…
import '/home/user/project/node_modules/lit/index.js'
A relative specifier: import '../node_modules/lit/index.js'
Or a URL Specifier: import 'https://unpkg.com/lit?module'
So you have four-ish options to tell the browser where to look for 'lit':1. Use a server that will use the node module resolution algorithm and transforms it to a relative specifier as it encounters the import (transform/build-ish?)
2. Use experimental "import maps" to go fully buildless to tell the browser where to point that bare module to (buildless)
3. Bundle all your code (build step)
4. Use a bundle from a CDN
Here are some examples of each:
Server that transforms import specifiers (lit.dev does this by default):
https://lit.dev/playground/#gist=9092862a77acf73dd1e6faa73a3... (build-ish)
Import Maps (2):
https://lit.dev/playground/#gist=0c4f66396b333c82cb27e7dd3b2... (buildless)
https://lit.dev/playground/#gist=91c0b286698612b013eb81881ff... (build-ish)
Url Specifiers (2):
https://lit.dev/playground/#gist=05655736300f0425644e61a6264... (buildless)
https://lit.dev/playground/#gist=6d23e8e8dadacd7488bdec81d0f... (build-ish)
hope this helps with some of your questions