I'm nervous about this. YouTube Premium is my favorite and most-used product. As long as ads stay gone and my grandfathered price doesn't change, I'm a very happy user.
YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
351–360 of 550 posts
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#352Earlier quoted context omitted.
What? I don't see any ads unless they're embedded in the video by the creator...?
Those are still ads and there are solutions to filter them out that Youtube could be more proactive about surfacing to premium users.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lgLYGBbDNs
Should it not let me see a product review if it was sponsored by the company that makes the product? Or only if the reviewers didn't have full editorial control?
Wherever you would want to draw the line, someone else would tell you that you drew it wrong.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#353I'm nervous about this. YouTube Premium is my favorite and most-used product. As long as ads stay gone and my grandfathered price doesn't change, I'm a very happy user.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#354It says Mohan launched 'youtube music' and 'shorts' et al. well, youtube music killed google play music, so not a fan; and shorts are the most recent annoying unfilterable addition to youtube.
ah well.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#355I'm nervous about this. YouTube Premium is my favorite and most-used product. As long as ads stay gone and my grandfathered price doesn't change, I'm a very happy user.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#356Earlier quoted context omitted.
A sponsorship in a video paid directly to the YouTuber is very different from a targeted ad that YouTube runs. It doesn't interrupt the content in unexpected ways (only ways planned by the creator), it's targeted based on content rather than data mining, and the creator usually tries to add a bit of personality to it. Not to mention you can skip them using the regular scrubbing controls rather than being forced to wa…
Yes. It is a somewhat-less-bad form of even more advertising. If you think paying to avoid some advertising is reasonable, why is paying more to avoid more advertising unreasonable?
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
i'm not sure if vine was a true failure. the only difference i see between that and tiktok is the focus on music and the less rigid length requirement. the users loved vine and it's still quoted in tiktoks i think it's because china is able to dump money it was able to take off more
> i'm not sure if vine was a true failure it isn’t around anymore.
Sometimes companies shutter successful products.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#358I'm nervous about this. YouTube Premium is my favorite and most-used product. As long as ads stay gone and my grandfathered price doesn't change, I'm a very happy user.
Converted my under 8$ dollar Google Play Music plan to 14$ family plan for my Wife, and they honored that 14$ cost when YTM rolled out.
While unlikely, I have been hoping for some sort of "we changed our mind" PR statement from Google on this before we switch to a family Spotify come April.
The price hike doesn't hurt on our monthly finances, but considering the 12 month cost vs features compared to Spotify... it does hurt. Why pay more for less.
Like others are saying, the no ads Youtube is fantastic. We do use adblockers on all of our devices, but it's hard to do on Google Homes, casting to Chromecasts, and Youtube Kids.
I am prepared to go Firefox + Ublock/Brave on my Android phone if I do go Spotify though....
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#359Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would you really want Twitter run by Sergei Brin's sister-in-law?
Are you suggesting that she is less qualified because of her sister's past relationships?
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki is stepping down
#360Earlier quoted context omitted.
A sponsorship in a video paid directly to the YouTuber is very different from a targeted ad that YouTube runs. It doesn't interrupt the content in unexpected ways (only ways planned by the creator), it's targeted based on content rather than data mining, and the creator usually tries to add a bit of personality to it. Not to mention you can skip them using the regular scrubbing controls rather than being forced to wa…
Yes. It is a somewhat-less-bad form of even more advertising. If you think paying to avoid some advertising is reasonable, why is paying more to avoid more advertising unreasonable?
If the sponsorships bug you that much, use sponsorblock.